Monday, May 20, 2013
 

DeLauro blasts postal service, GOP, for end to Saturday delivery

With a local mail processing plant and hundreds of jobs in her district at stake, Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District, Wednesday condemned the U.S. Postal Service's plan to end Saturday delivery.

"Today's announcement is bad news both for the postal service's employees and people across the country," DeLauro said. "I have deep concerns that cutting Saturday delivery will lead to layoffs and facility closings at a time when our economy can least afford it.

"The Wallingford processing facility in particular is a real concern," she continued, "and I will work with my colleagues in Connecticut's congressional delegation to do everything in our power to keep it open."

A processing center in Stamford is also on the chopping block.

Under the postal service's plans, some of the work that takes place in the Wallingford and Stamford plants would be shifted to a facility in Hartford.

The USPS is curtailing service and wants to shut processing plants and little-used post offices to try to stop the hemorrhaging of money that has put it in the red.

Last year, former Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., marshaled a bill through the Senate that would give the USPS some breathing room and postpone the shuttering of processing centers and post offices. But the House of Representatives did not act.

DeLauro said, "Republicans in the House of Representatives were too busy posturing to take it up."

"We must stop lurching from crisis to crisis," DeLauro said. "It is time for Congress to act and put the postal service on the path to financial solvency."

Comments

Submitted by DonGonsalves on 02/06/2013 02:02 pm

As typical of DeLauro another stupid statement. What would she suggest to make them profitable ?. Be specific . Tell us what you reccomend? Raise the postage rates again and again which will lead to more people not using the post office. Has she ever looked at their fringe benefit benefits,pensions,work hours/week health benefits etc. When the postal service spun off from the US government the first thing they did was to increase all their benefits which were very high to begin with. Why dosen't she say something about that.All she is doing which is normal for long term politicians is to please people that do not deserve to be helped. As far as I am concerned forget Saturday delivery.

Submitted by ChristopherSchaefer on 02/06/2013 06:02 pm

A typical DeLauro rant: she complains about the elimination of Saturday postal delivery “at a time when our economy can least afford it.” That's because in DeLauro's vote-pandering fantasy world, government services are an endless freebie. In "DeLauro-land" we'll just let the NEXT generation pick up the pieces when the govt. no longer can afford to offer ANY services—because careerist politicians like DeLauro will have spent our govt. so deeply into debt there will be nothing left—except monthly govt. checks sent off to our Chinese creditors. While her pandering secures her own endless political career—which garners her an annual income of c. $2 million per year—she can continue to make unrealistic promises to stay in her lucrative office. Because, thanks to a lifetime of cronyism, her OWN retirement savings ARE endless: http://rosadelauroexposed.wordpress.com/

Submitted by MrLogical on 02/06/2013 06:02 pm

"I have deep concerns that cutting Saturday delivery will lead to layoffs and facility closings at a time when our economy can least afford it."

I have deep concerns that there WONT'T be layoffs and closings. I did an experiment before the holidays. For 2 months, I recorded the number of pieces of mail I rec's every day: 1) the number of pieces of junk mail (~90% went unopened); and, 2) the number of pieces of 'real' mail. At the end of the 2 months, 83% of the mail was junk mail, all delivered at bulk rates that I subsidize every time I buy a first-class stamp. With very little effort, the USPS could deliver mail 3 days per week (M-W-F) and cut their staff and facilities by almost 50%. Solvency problem solved.

The USPS lost $15B last year. It is on pace to lose another $14-16B this year. At some point, the piper will need to be paid (viz., the USPS pension fund bailed out) and the US taxpayer is going to get stuck with the bill.

The USPS has more post offices than WalMart, McDonald's, Starbucks and Burger King combined. I have 5 post office locations within 6 miles of my house; 4 of them within 3 miles.

If the USPS was a private company, it would have done one of the following sometime over the past decade:

1) Gone out of business.
2) Dramatically reorganized and restructured.

We don't have buggy whips anymore, nor kerosene lamps or cars with cranks instead of electric starters. Times change, markets change, customers change. Progress happens. Only the post office doesn't change.

Submitted by MrLogical on 02/06/2013 06:02 pm

"It is time for Congress to act and put the postal service on the path to financial solvency."

Cut it by 50%.

Upside: Fiscal solvency achieved.
Downside: The remaining 50% of the emp's will finally have to put in an 8-hour day.*

(* I worked one summer in the post office while a college student back in the '70s and I know of what I speak.)

Quit trying to protect the union drones, Rosa, and try working for the taxpayer for a change.

Submitted by Jim in Mfg (not verified) on 02/06/2013 07:02 pm

Stopping Saturday delivery is a government cost cutting measure that makes much sense. Sadly, my congresswoman, Rosa DeLauro, has no (i.e. zip, nada) ideas nor any inclination to reduce the cost of government.

I pay my bills electronically.
My company uses the USPS rarely as virtually all business that previously was conducted via snail mail, is now conducted via email.
So why force-feed (with OT) the USPS dinosaur when it doesn't have the business level to support it? Paying people for services that nobody wants is economic idiocy.

DeLauro says "It is time for.Congress to act and put the postal service on the path to financial solvency." What the heck does she mean? If she wants to keep government employees on the payroll when there is not enough work for them to do, then she is not putting the USPS on the path become another drag on real GDP.

I would like to give her a "pink slip" for her "lack of work" in reducing government waste.

Submitted by Art Vandelay on 02/07/2013 03:02 am

What a hypocrite. She comes to the aid of the US Postal Service yet all her correspondence with her constituents is by e-mail only. I do not live in her district but have tried several times to contact her office. Her website is specifically designed so that only residents in her district can correspond with her office.

All she's trying to do is protect Government Employee Union jobs. If it were cuts by UPS or FEDEX she could care less.

Submitted by Jim N on 02/07/2013 05:02 am

The post office should have terminated Saturday delivery years ago. It serves no useful purpose. And no rosa, the function of the the post office is not to employ people. The function is to deliver mail. I don't see ending Saturday delivery will necessarily close facilities. The volume of mail will be the same. Staff reductions either by attrition or layoffs yes but wholesale closing of facilities. Probably not. Yes, I am Democrat, but I am getting real tired of the Connecticut Democrat party and Rosa is a one of the many reasons.

Submitted by Art Vandelay on 02/10/2013 09:02 am

Rosa DeLauro is a devote Socialist. She's also one of the richest members of Congress with a net worth in excess of 17 million dollars. Within 5 years and during one of the greatest recessions since the Great Depression, Congresswoman Delauro has increased her wealth from 5 to 17 million dollars while her constituents are in constant fear of loosing their jobs and declaring bankruptcy.

She has had a consistent self dealing relationship with her husband Stanley Greenburg's polling firm Greenburg/Quinlan/Rosner Research. In essence she raises money for her campaign only to re-direct it into her husbands firm. She is the "Champion of the Safety Net" while at the same time amassing a fortune for herself and her husband.

She has yet to reveal her tax returns during a Congressional Election.

She is a champion and at the forefront of contributing to Obama's gigantic national debt and out of control spending. During this same period her personal wealth has increased 250% and yet she has voted to increase the national debt 200%.

She and her husband own a multi million dollar townhouse just blocks from the U.S. Capitol which is ideal for entertaining her Democratic Party friends. She entertains several times a month spending close to a quarter of a million dollars on Catering and Wines from 2007 to 2010. The funds for these lavish parties comes from her Democratic Future Leadership PAC. She's a champion at spending other peoples money and not her own.

She's a champion at trying to solve hunger and poverty in this nation while she sits in her study at her million dollar mansion at 49 Huntington St. in New Haven.

Last June Congresswoman DeLauro introduced a bill requesting 128 million be spent to help control risky manipulation of derivatives. Why did she spend 20 years in Congress before they finally banned insider trading by members of Congress. I wonder how much she took advantage of that little loophole???.

In her 22 year tenure in Congress DeLauro sponsored 30 Bills of which NONE were ever passed into law. She Co-Sponsored 270 Bills of which 11 saw the light of day. Her annual salary is $174,000.00 p/year. If I were that productive in the private sector I'd be fired in a New York minute.

Over half of her PAC money and Campaign Donations come from out of state and from special interest contributors. In her last million dollar campaign only $60,000 came from individual donations. The only problem Rosa DeLauro is trying to solve is getting re-elected. She's not trying to solve the problems of her constituents.

Rahm Emanuel, Obama's former chief of staff and current Mayor of Chicago lived for 5 years in a rent free DC Basement apartment owned by Rosa DeLauro. The townhouse is located on 816 E. Capitol St. NE Washington D.C. It's zoned and taxed as a 1 family dwelling making a basement apartment illegal. The arrangement violated congressional ethical guidelines in that Emanual should have listed the apartment usage as income and did not.

It's impossible to find out where she will appear next. When she approaches the podium it's always with a well rehearsed 3 ring binder for which she NEVER diverts from her script. Catch her off the cuff and she's a blabbering idiot. http://youtu.be/xTsaoPyQxRe

Her motto! Vote for me and I'll make sure Government takes care of your every need. I'll eliminate every incentive for self-improvement, since big Government will do everything from pay your rent, pay for your food, and give you a job. We'll pay for it by "Taxing the Rich" so life is "fair" because "it's the right thing to do".

DeLauro's indoctrination into Socialist Ideology came from her education at the Fabian London School of Economics. It's part of the Fabian Society which is a British Socialist organization whose purpose is to advance the principles of Democratic Socialism via gradualist and reformist, rather than revolutionary means. (Google Fabian Society)

Here are the real issues of the 3rd Connecticut District which DeLauro Represents.
1. Unacceptably High Unemployment
2. Deficit Spending
3. Exploding National Debt

These are the major issues which Rosa DeLauro refuses to address. In fact she is a major contributor to these continuing problems. As long as Rosa DeLauro remains in office the recession will continue, unemployment will continue to rise, the national debt will rise, and Social Security/Medicare will be bankrupt.

For more information about the true Rosa DeLauro log onto the website Rosa DeLauro Revealed.