Tuesday, May 21, 2013
 

Group organizing campus walkout if tuition increases approved

Sick of the routine tuition hikes at the state's colleges, a former student is organizing students to walk out of class and head to the state Capitol the day the Board of Regents for Higher Education approves increasing tuition.

"It has become abundantly clear that students are being used as an ATM," said Danny Ravizza, who attended Western Connecticut State University until 2011.

"There needs to be a concerted effort to stop this or it's just going to continue," said Ravizza, who is now an organizer with Connecticut Citizen Action Group.

The movement to derail the proposed $778-a-year spike in costs to attend Central, Eastern, Southern and Western Connecticut state universities may be gaining momentum.

In the past month, 178 people have signed an online petition to the governing Board of Regents asking it to vote against tuition increases. And 112 people have become "members" of Ravizza's Facebook group, known as Students of Connecticut Universities for Democracy.

"I'm paying for college myself and I'm only 23 years old. I don't know if I can afford to go to graduate school at this rate," Cynthia Green of New Haven signed.

A spokeswoman for the system said affordability is on the minds of the regents as they work to balance the system's budget.

"The Board of Regents' Finance Committee will review tuition and fee proposals tomorrow (Tuesday, Feb. 19), understanding that, in this fiscal climate, any increase can be difficult for our students to absorb. The Regents are particularly mindful of the affordable option our institutions have represented for in-state students, while at the same time, are seeking to make our institutions more attractive to out-of-state students who pay additional money to attend," Colleen Flanagan Johnson wrote in an email.

In a flyer being distributed to the faculty and students at the campuses, the citizen group indicates that it is working with the student government associations.

The complaints are threefold: cuts in state funding, a reduction in student representation on the system's governing board and routine increases in tuition.

Over the last two school years, state funding for the dozen community colleges and four state colleges has declined by 15.3 percent, or $49.4 million. If this tuition proposal is adopted, tuition will have increased by at least $1,000 a year for the average student, an 11.8 percent increase in three years. Additionally, there are eight new fees many students will be required to pay next year.

Saying students and staff are "near a breaking point," the flyer says "there are also talks with the Western and Central faculty members to suspend classes on the day of the tuition hike vote and bus students up to the Capitol to have our voices heard. Western and Central's SGA's have stepped up to appropriate the travel funds as soon as the faculty is on board."

The Regents' Finance panel is scheduled to vote on a tuition plan Tuesday. Ravizza said a group of students are planning to attend the meeting to oppose the proposal.

Comments

Submitted by surely (not verified) on 02/19/2013 04:02 am

So if the students walk out who's going to do all the work on the campuses???? They hire so many students and university assistants to help the cronies not do their work. No hiring freeze for them but if you don't have the money why hire them????!!!! Some students just do their homework and get paid for it. University assistants are all politically connected. Wrong, wrong, wrong!!! How much money is being spent on these part time positions??? Get rid of them. Hold the full timers accountable!

Submitted by Kenny47 on 02/19/2013 08:02 am

Higher education is the next big bubble about to burst. Bloated administrative staffs, "diversity officers," deans, sub-deans, chancellors, provosts, etc. and, primarily, the influence of the increasing federal dollars have conspired to boost tuition far above the rate of inflation. And Obama wants to increase federal aid to students so, ultimately, colleges can boost tuition even further. It's all a gigantic scam to keep the adults employed at six figure salaries while students get shortchanged and left with debt. Parents and students are increasingly coming to the realization that much of higher education is not useful to future job prospects. Indeed the value of a four-year degree has been vastly overblown, causing many students to go deeply into debt that will keep them saddled for years. And today, 53% of graduates are either unemployed or underemployed. Remember the NY Times article about the NYU graduate in gender studies and religious studies who graduated with $100,000 in debt and a job paying about $25,000 as a photographer's assistant? Lot of good that degree got her. Do you think her gender studies advisor ever broached the topic of what she was going to do with that worthless degree? Think again.

An undergraduate education is largely about credentialing, i.e. paying vast sums for the status symbol of showing that you attended a "prestigious" institution, even though you probably gained little in the way of practical education. A degree is also a sorting mechanism to demonstrate to potential employers that, from among the general population of potential job applicants, you were able to show up on time and complete assignments. The Intercollegiate Studies Institute's annual surveys have demonstrated that most college graduates come out of a four-year experience knowing less about American history and government (i.e. civic knowledge) than when they entered. Students at Harvard scored best, with a D+ (score of 69). Students at Eastern Connecticut State University not too well--at 39.

The future of higher education has already begun. It’s called online education. There is a vast potential in devising means of delivering high quality education over the Internet at far less cost, and far less debt. Think about the "Great Courses" that feature some of the country's top scholars and teachers that you can buy on DVD. Recruit the top professors and deliver lectures that can be watched on your computer or on your television screen. These programs could be expanded to replicate the most common course offerings. The economies of scale could greatly reduce the cost of higher education. This could be augmented with some one-on-one mentoring, guided reading lists, and examinations to demonstrate mastery. An added benefit would be the elimination of political agendas and indoctrination, which would not with stand scrutiny with such transparency. This would require greater responsibility and self-motivation on the part of students, but, then, if they don't have that motivation in the first place, they don't belong in higher education and are just wasting their parent's, and taxpayers, money. For many students, of course, a four year undergraduate experience is just an excuse to delay adolescence and party.

Such a program will, naturally, have a severe impact on high-priced, but not top tier, schools--Fairfield U. ($50,000+ per year), Connecticut College and Wesleyan come to find--that are charging astronomical sums to credential students. They will be forced to either adapt or die.

I know from personal experience about the perils of higher education costs. My niece and her husband (both in their early 40s) are saddled with a combined $200,000 in college debt from degrees at Brown and the University of Iowa (PhD in psychology and an MBA). They will be paying that debt until they retire and begin collecting Social Security. The debt has become their mortgage--they cannot afford to buy a house in CA because a down payment is out of their reach. I put my two children through state schools, and they have zero debt. A son of an acquaintance of mine learned plumbing and now makes over $75,000/year, about what my niece makes with her PhD. He's got a 401(k) to which he's contributing the maximum, having started doing so at age 22. That will, perhaps, give him two more doublings of his investment portfolio than the college graduate who doesn't start investing seriously until she is in her early to late 30s (or never in the case of my niece). By retirement, this difference will amount to several hundred thousand dollars that would not have been earned without the last doubling (or two). Whether Einstein said it or not, compound interest is one of the greatest forces in the universe. Bottom line: getting good educational and financial advice at an early age is critical to future professional and financial success. The colleges and universities are not going to tell you these things. They just want your hard-earned tuition dollars and won't be around when the loan payments come due.

Submitted by realkook on 02/20/2013 04:02 am

We are creating a nation of 100% addicts who are taught that from the time of birth until their death, they should be given the birth right privilege of "entitlements", i.e. getting everything free to lead a life of luxury and no work to legitimately earn for what they consume. It is the hard working core that is penalized to pay for these parasites. Student aid, medic aid, welfare payments etc. are all a way of robbing the hard working people.

Let us start from the scratch. Let every family take full responsibility to educate their children from their own earnings. No subsidies and no freebies from childhood. Let us create a nation of hard working and self-respecting individuals. The nation will become stronger and prosperous in the world. There are no short cuts and no wishful thinking and poppycock theories from economists and career politicians. Cut out the politics and policies of robbing your neighbor.