Foley already is eyeing a 2014 rematch with Malloy

January 24, 2011

By Mark Pazniokas

Tom Foley, the Republican businessman who narrowly lost a bitterly contested race for governor last fall, is positioning himself for a rematch with Gov. Dannel P. Malloy in 2014, not a run for Connecticut's open U.S. Senate seat in 2012.

In an interview, Foley said he was content to cede the GOP nomination for the Senate to Linda McMahon, the Republican nominee who lost to Democrat Richard Blumenthal last year, or one of the other Republicans now exploring a run to succeed the retiring independent, Joseph I. Lieberman.

"I still think I'm best-qualified and best-able to help Connecticut in the governor's office," said Foley, who grew wealthy acquiring and running companies. "So, I think I'll be looking seriously at 2014. I hope to have an opportunity to run again."

Tom Foley

Tom Foley

To lay the groundwork, Foley is trying to position his campaign manager, Justin Clark of West Hartford, as the next party chairman, assist Republicans in next month's special elections and create a policy group to promote economic-development issues and education reforms.

"I felt privileged to have the ability to run and affect the dialogue and meet so many people, getting 560,000 votes," Foley said. "I enjoyed it and want to stay involved."

Foley and McMahon each are expected to headline annual Lincoln Day fundraisers for local GOP town committees, keeping their names fresh and generating good will among the rank and file. The prospect of Foley and McMahon working in concert - or at least not at cross purposes -- is a plus for a party that holds no statewide office or congressional seats in Connecticut and controls neither chamber of the General Assembly

Foley briefly ran for Senate until Gov. M. Jodi Rell announced her retirement in November 2009. He quickly switched to the race for governor, leaving McMahon to win a three-way primary. Her primary and general campaigns cost her nearly $50 million.

McMahon is undeclared for 2012, but she is behaving like a candidate, traveling the state and speaking to Republican groups.

"If Linda runs, I think she'll be a good candidate," Foley said. "She's done it before, and she's fresh. If she doesn't, there are others who have expressed an interest."

As for the possibility he would consider a run, he seemed to view himself as a last resort, saying he believes is better suited as a candidate for governor than the U.S. Senate.

"If people felt I was the right person to run and came to ask, I'd certainly consider it," said Foley, who was the ambassador to Ireland during the closing years of the administration of George W. Bush.

Foley, who turned 59 the weekend after Malloy's inauguration, spent $10.8 million of his own money losing the state's closest gubernatorial race in a half-century. Foley was edged by Malloy in a three-way race, 49.5 percent to 49 percent.

He is keeping the core of his campaign organization intact, helping Republican candidates in next month's special elections to fill nine legislative vacancies, including six left by lawmakers who joined the Malloy administration.

"Some of the people who were involved in my campaign team, including Justin Clark, we're still sort of assembled and helping" other candidates, Foley said.

Foley intends to promote Clark for Republican state chairman should Chris Healy decline to seek another two-year term in June.

"If Chris is not planning on staying in the role, then I think Justin Clark would make an excellent party chair," Foley said. "He's got a lot of experience at hard work, and he's young and energetic. He knows what needs to be done."

Foley also is organizing a group that will develop issues, but he said it is not intended as a shadow government.

"I am going to be forming a policy group focused on education reform and long-term economic policy for the state to make sure all the policy makers in the state are doing things for the long term and not selling the state short," he said.

Healy, who is undecided about running for another term as chairman, said, "I think he is doing the right thing by trying to build a platform where he and other Republicans are engaged on the issues."

Foley said the effort is not intended to oppose the policies of the new governor, whose first challenge is to cope with a deficit estimated at $3.67 billion. During the campaign, Foley said the deficit--equal to 20 percent of the state's $19 billion budget--could be closed without tax increases.

"In many cases, we may be in alignment," Foley said. "There are really pretty limited options."

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

We do not need money bags to

We do not need money bags to run for political office since they can not and will not be altruistic - never. Whether they made their millions and billions by foul, illegal, immoral, and unfair means has to be determined first by a thorough audit by an impartial agency. This means that such individuals have to make their life an open page and I doubt it very much if any millionaire will do it. We need honest and decent people to run and do their job for an extremely limited period of time, say 3 to 4 years maximum.

realkook, Really well thought

realkook,

Really well thought out explanation... We really would prefer to have unsuccessful people in public office because afterall unsuccessful, uneducated and the would do a FAR better job understanding the complexities of running the state than people like Tom Foley who have been successful, have excellent educational credentials and have done something with their lives.

Governor Union-Puppet lost 76% of the state in the last election. Had there not been the cheating in Bridgeport he'd have lost. Yet he's acting like he's on some sort of mandate. He's delusional and makes Obama seem conservative by comparison.

Tom Foley

Read More

Mitch Beck: Very simple. Any

Mitch Beck: Very simple. Any house wife who manages a household of seven or eight people knows that you can not spend any amount that you do not have in hand. This means that the states should go on purely a "cash basis" rather than the so-called accrual basis for budgeting as well, and borrowing should be banned by constitutional amendment since it mortgages the future generations without obtaining their consent, and the state should be required to balance its books within +/= 0.5% deviation.