State could face sanctions for food stamp problems

February 23, 2011

By Arielle Levin Becker

Connecticut wrongly denies food stamps to eligible residents at a higher rate than any other state. It ranks among the worst in the nation in processing food stamp applications on time and paying out accurate levels of benefits. And federal officials warn that without a "tremendous turnaround," the state could face significant financial sanctions.

Starkowski 2-22-11

Starkowski: We know we have a problem

"We're really concerned with what's happening in Connecticut," James Arena-DeRosa, northeast regional administrator for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrition Service, told members of the Human Services and Appropriations committees Tuesday.

Legislators called the figures he presented shocking. Twenty-six percent of cases in which food stamps were denied or cut off were the result of errors, according to preliminary fiscal-year 2010 figures based on a sample of cases. Fewer than 60 percent of applications were processed in a timely manner, and the rate of inaccurate benefit payments was second-worst in the country.

Arena-DeRosa noted that the state Department of Social Services, which administers the program, has faced a "tremendous challenge" addressing the increased demand for food stamps. The number of state residents receiving food assistance grew by 30 percent from the 2009 to 2010 fiscal years, to more than 336,000 people.

But Arena-DeRosa and deputy regional administrator Mary Ferris warned that the state could face financial sanctions if it does not improve its performance. Ferris estimated that the sanctions could range from $800,000 to $1 million.

Appropriations co-chairwoman Sen. Toni N. Harp, D-New Haven, called the numbers embarrassing for both the department and the General Assembly.

"Not because we're last," she said. "But more so because of the people who've been denied benefits inappropriately and people who've had a hard time getting them in the first place."

DSS Commissioner Michael Starkowski said the problems are the result of understaffing, outdated technology and the surge in demand for services the department administers.

"The underinvestment that we've made in the staff and the underinvestment that we've made in the technology has come home to roost," he told legislators.

Food stamps--known formally as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP--are fully funded by the federal government, and the state receives federal reimbursement for 50 percent of the cost of administering the program.

Starkowski described DSS as attempting to address rising demand for services with a dwindling staff, which is down more than 19 percent since 2001. The department was only allowed to hire 58 workers to evaluate applicant eligibility after losing 120 in a 2009 early retirement incentive program, he said.

DSS administers a vast array of health and welfare programs, from child care subsidies to elderly prescription assistance, and staff members evaluate clients' eligibility for all programs the department administers. The 586 people currently doing intake and case management each handle an average of 1,750 cases a month, Deputy Commissioner Claudette Beaulieu said.

"That is frankly staggering," she said.

And workers have to process applications using technology Starkowski referred to as "our dinosaur." The enrollment management system the department uses was designed in 1989 and uses a programming language so outdated it can take 3 to 6 months to make a change in how it works, he said.

"We're saying we know we have a problem," he said.

The USDA officials pointed to other factors that set Connecticut apart. Many other states have workers specialize in a particular portion of the eligibility process, such as intake, verifying information or recertification, rather than handling an individual case from start to finish.

Ferris said the DSS workers who once specialized in SNAP now have other responsibilities too. No other state in the region has done that, she said.

Arena-DeRosa and Ferris

USDA's James Arena-DeRosa and Mary Ferris: state could face sanctions

Arena-DeRosa said Vermont is hiring more workers to handle applications. And he suggested learning lessons from some DSS offices that are performing better than the state as a whole. "In some places, it's not as bad," he said.

He and Ferris also noted that DSS' information technology system has serious shortcomings.

They said their agency can serve as a partner for the state in addressing the problems, and said the federal government can provide technical assistance.

Other states that have successfully modernized their systems have used online applications, call centers that can free eligibility workers to handle cases, and document imaging centers that allow for paperless functioning, they said.

Starkowski said implementing a new eligibility system could be a multi-year process and cost hundreds of millions of dollars, although much of it could be reimbursed by the federal government. Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's proposed budget calls for $2 million and 10 staff over the next two years to work with consultants to write a request for proposals for a new system.

As for more immediate fixes, Starkowski said there's no silver bullet, but the department is trying to chip away at the edges until it can get a new eligibility system and more staff to handle the caseload.

The department received authorization to hire 25 eligibility service workers and expects to get final approval within the week, he said.

In three months, an interactive voice response telephone system should be available that would allow people to call in and receive information about the status of their applications or the level of benefits they'll get without requiring staff time, Starkowski said. After that, the department is expected to get a document imaging system that will make it easier for workers to access files. The department handles more than 3.7 million pieces of paper each month, he said.

DSS is also looking into arrangements that would allow community agencies to help process food stamp applications. The state must determine eligibility, but outside agencies could help clients prepare applications.

And officials are developing pilot programs for some offices. Some have SNAP-only units, and one office will get a call center for SNAP and HUSKY health plan cases. The department has also increased accountability, including requiring supervisors to review cases.

But Starkowski noted that the department is facing increased demand across the range of social service programs it administers. If he dedicated 30 percent of his staff to processing food stamp applications, he told legislators, he would probably be back in front of legislators in a few months, explaining why applications for HUSKY or other programs are not being processed in time.

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

It's tragic that people are

It's tragic that people are going hungry because of mismanagement and obsolete technology.

Before someone complains about entitlements, please note that SNAP (Food Stamps) is intended to support American farmers. That's why it's operated by the Dept. of Agriculture. This is a wonderful way to support farms by getting needed food to the people.

That being said, what more basic need do people have? Food for the hungry is the most important service the government can offer. The increasing eligibility tells us that people are going hungry as a result of lost

Read More

We're asked to make

We're asked to make sacrifices by the governor in the form of higher taxes, in large part to keep state workers employed, whose managers routinely make over $100,000 and get free healthcare, pensions, etc. At the very least, for my money, I'd expect our bureaucrats to be efficient, hard-working, and competent. But according to this article, they don't even seem to meet the lowest thresholds of competency.

One can't help but ask why,

One can't help but ask why, even allowing for a "national search", it is taking the Governor so long to fill this and other key commissionerships (ie DOT and DECD).

Leadership matters and these deparments have none.

So who is responsible for the

So who is responsible for the "outdated technology" from 1989? Isn't the commissioner responsible for the DSS budget and shouldn't this have been addressed a decade ago? It's always the same tired excuses of understaffing and lack of money when in fact state government spending grows every year. What we have is a serious lack of accountability and poor management.

I've said it before on other

I've said it before on other pages--the previous governors of this state were negligent to an awful degree. The governor actually mentioned these old computers in his budget speech-this computerized system will take 10s of millions to replace. The $2million is pay for expert consultantancy to evaluate the best way/system to replace leveraging federal aid. The current governor is making a start on addressing the problem. I would agree that the previous governors did not meet even a minimum standard of competency. The subject of appropriate wages and benefits for state employees (including managers) is another question...but I

Read More

It's unbelievable that the

It's unbelievable that the Rowland-Rell Commissioner of DSS has been allowed to stay on one more minute since Malloy took office. He's supposedly retired, double dipping on salary and pension while the few DSS caseworkers who are left are overburdened with undertstaffing and mismanagement for years now. It's amazing that he has the nerve to now say he's been mishandling DSS programs all along and has dragged his feet on helping DSS workers help the poorest of our citizens. What does he care- he has his peacock regime and all his minions still following him blindly. And the Governor

Read More

I worked for the State of CT

I worked for the State of CT as a Supervisor in the Department of Social Services. I have worked for the department in different capacities and I have never seen it as bad as it is now. We are understaffed for the number of people we are responsible to assist. The Department runs on the backs of the front line staff, while there are Managers out there who take 4 hour lunches and can never be found. That is where the problem is, not with the folks who meet with residents each and every day.

Read More

Technology is always changing

Technology is always changing and we need to have a system that is accurate and processes information in a timely manner. They should be able to design a system that weeds out fraud and abuse. I have seen people who are currently receiving food stamps buying items that were a luxury and not a necessity and have heard about the cards being sold for cash. Stop the abuse and then maybe you can get the ones who should be on this program the benefits they deserve.

Malloy needs to clean house

Malloy needs to clean house at DSS. Years of mismanagement and cronyism have left the agency weak and directionless. Governor Malloy needs to bring in new leadership - - that includes replacing the three politically appointed Regional Administrators who serve "at the will of the Governor."

The food stamp program helps

The food stamp program helps low-income people buy food. Although it is a federal government program, it is run by state or local agencies. The program can be a great help for the families who find it expensive to buy healthy lunch for their schooling kids. If a spending bill launched in Congress on Monday will be approved, suggested adjustments to school lunch programs would be blocked. Pizza, French fries, and tater tots can all be measured as veggies as reported by current United States Department of Agriculture guidelines. If Congress does stop these adjustments, then these rules would

Read More