Concerned that the state's public colleges and universities are spending too much on administration, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy wants to require that all non-teaching hiring at the state's public colleges and universities be approved by his budget office.
"It's an added control mechanism that we make sure we are actually spending as much money as we possibly can in classrooms as opposed to in administration positions," Malloy said Thursday. "So I think it's a good idea to have someone keeping an eye on it."
Non-faculty staff--which includes administration, maintenance, health service, public safety, financial services and information technology staff--comprise nearly 70 percent of full-time employees at the University of Connecticut. At the Connecticut State University System and the state's 12-campus community college system, the faculty-staff ratio is closer to 50-50, according to a State Department of Higher Education report.
"We've seen a lot of growth in non-faculty. Some of it is understandable but given the track record we've seen in the last 20 years, a little more engagement on position control is worth it," said Higher Education Commissioner Michael Meotti.
Over the last 20 years, as enrollment increased by 24 percent at the public institutions, there were 1,955 new faculty positions created compared with an additional 3,993 non-faculty positions, according to the 2009 SDOHE report.
A breakdown by the institution shows at UConn and CSUS' four campuses and central office the majority of new positions were non-faculty. At the community colleges the majority of growth was in teaching positions.
University and college officials, who have enjoyed hiring decision autonomy for the last 20 years, are not supportive of the change.
"It's going to delay things," said Richard J. Balducci, acting chairman of the CSUS Board of Trustees. "You are talking about adding another level, and anytime you do that you add time.... Now it's done in a relatively quick fashion. I think the process works."
Ben Barnes, who heads the budget office that would review hiring decisions, disagrees it would slow the process down.
"It's all done electronically. It doesn't sit for more than a day. We are not talking about a lot of time," he said. "I don't think it's unreasonable for the governor and [the Office of Policy and Management] to ask for justification."
"We are not in the business of second guessing their decisions, but if they want to hire 15 custodians we just want to make sure there are vacant positions and that they have money to do that," he added. "I would rather they not be hiring new people if it means some faculty may be laid off."
Colleges have made their hiring decisions independently since 1991, when the public institutions were given almost complete fiscal autonomy through a block grant system. This decision followed a government efficiency report that concluded the then-current higher education budgeting process was ineffective and overly restrictive. The legislature trimmed the state's contribution to higher education, but gave university officials authority to decide how nearly all dollars were spent.
Mary Anne Cox, assistant chancellor for the community colleges, also has concerns with the proposal.
"That would be a disadvantage for our colleges," she said, adding it is "shifting the decision to an office that doesn't understand higher education like we do."
In a report given to Malloy's transition team, the community colleges said state lawmaker involvement could cause major issues.
"Excessive oversight, unnecessary regulations, and redundant levels of approval for many administrative activities often undermine the ability of the Community Colleges to efficiently respond to the needs of students, our business partners and the communities we serve," it reads.
Malloy's proposal will need to be approved by state lawmakers and college and university officials will have a chance to provide input on the change during public hearings before the legislature's Appropriations Committee, which begin Thursday night.
Another micro-manager that is not focusing on what really matters.
Once again, it seems that the community colleges are being painted with the same broad brush as that used on the CSUs and UConn when, in reality, they are doing a perfectly fine job of managing their budgets, balancing their workforce, and providing a quality education to an ever-increasing student population. It is naive to think that only faculty contribute to this education - teaching and learning occur outside the classroom as well. And when there are 5 counselors for 1000 times that many students, can you really argue that a faculty hire is the only choice? It's insulting to
Read MoreThe big lecture by WordyGirl clearly indicates that most of the students admitted to the community colleges are below par education-wise and need some kind of counseling. This is how proliferation of non-essential, non-teaching personnel in a community college environment (and may be even in a four year public institution) is taking place. If a student can not read and write, and understand/comprehend clearly what he/she reads; and needs remedial education (counseling is needed simply because most of the community college students can not do one or more of these functions or cope with other aspects of life and
Read MoreHas the existing system worked well? Far from it. Change is good and more accountability is required. Let's Give Governor Malloy the benefit of the doubt on these issues.
As a layman, I am not privy to the details of staffing at CT public colleges. What I will note is that the consistent news about the institutions of higher education concern its sports victories, its sports corruption scandals, and its drunken brawls. This is not "normal". Kept under wraps are the actual academic statistics, such as the fact that U. Conn Medical School, the purported jewel in the crown, lost its accreditation last year. Who knows what other indicators of decline are kept under wraps.
The acid test of reputation is how many students from out of state
Read MoreThe hiring of some non-faculty is essential as the universities expand their facilities and bring on more students. But the hiring of friends and the politically connected to fill positions at the central offices is a waste of tax dollars. It will be interesting to keep track of the hacks flushed out of CSU, for example, to see what new state jobs they land. If the governor is truly serious, he will see that this form of job swapping does not occur.
Ben Barnes needs to get to know his agency better. Personnel approvals have been known to linger at OPM for MONTHS, in part to force savings. There are valid reasons for doing what the Governor is proposing, but lets be honest about the facts.
OPM should talk. They have more high paying managers than any other department in the state. They should look in the mirror first and clean their own house of watse.
UConn already has to be approved by DAS to hire anybody, so why add another layer of FAT! Get rid of 1/3 of the cost in OPM and our budget will be half way to being in the balck.
I was so upset I spelled waste wrong. AGAIN too any managers making all the bad decisions and getting all the money. 10 times the rate for longevity, WHY? Because you're a manager? Bull Get rid of longevity and suck it up that you are working for the State as a privledge. Don't like it, quit and go work on Wall street and rip the public off there until you get caught.
I have to challenge realkooks assertion that "counseling is needed simply because most of the community college students can not do one or more of these functions or cope with other aspects of life and education." Counselors at community colleges assist students with choosing a course of study, examining career opportunities, preparing to transfer to baccalaureate institutions and, when needed, balance work, family and school demands. To imply that community college student are somehow sub-par because of the range of student services available to them is simply insulting.
With all due respect to Mr. Balducci and Ms. Cox, no one expects either of you to roll over and play dead. And you may feel an obligation to defend the status quo. However, it's appears quite obvious that you intend to dig your heels in; that would only make it more painful to extract you from your ossified thinking. Time to wake up and smell the coffee here. If you had paid even slight attention to what Mr. Malloy has been saying all along you would have realized that, among other things, he made it
Read MoreOh, that makes perfect sense! Add a layer of bureaucracy to hiring. Isn't that one of the reasons we ended up in this situation? Maybe there can be a new 'system office' full of empty suits getting paid 100k plus bennies (oh wait, the 100k salaries are for the chauffers - I hear Denise Nappier is looking for a new one!). Way to go Dannel.
There are very good managers in the CSU and UCONN systems. - there are also people who exist to make unnecessary regulations and expenses. I absolutely agree that some people's jobs could be eliminated. The trick will be to get rid of the dead wood while keeping the live wires.
I wonder, WHO does Gov Malloy think does most of the work outside the classroom? Faculty work 3-5 hours per week, they're gone early May - late August, and mid-December - late January. STAFF support the academic programs, if you relied on Faculty, you'd be very sorry. Half of them can't do the basics, like remember a password or type a letter. Perhaps you should expect more for your money, faculty in prof. schools are making just shy of 200k, before you look to reduce staff.
The correct answer is to fine every university or college that spends less than 70% of its total revenue in teaching and research departments.
Students are paying subject fees. They have a right to expect that money to pay for subjects.
If the institutions still refuse to act responsibly, then also increase taxes on the administrators and board members personally, until they comply.
Zoetropo (who is utterly dismayed at the self-destructive behavior of universities in the western world: no wonder we are fading while Asia is thriving)
Ceecee13: after 30 years teaching, I earn $70k a year, while useless administrators earn over $300k just to multiply their empires at faculty expense. What private company can compete if it spends over 60% of its revenue on administrative overheads?
As for work hours, I teach 16 hours of classes each week, plus preparation and marking, and research. For several years my contact hours reached 30-40 hours a week, three semesters a year (summer included), without any benefit to me other than the satisfaction of seeing many hundreds of students from across the campus learning what they
Students are paying subject fees. They have a right to expect that money to pay for subjects.