Is higher ed reorganization happening? Depends on whom you ask

April 25, 2011

By Jacqueline Rabe Thomas

Missing from the 467-page budget agreement announced last week was a plan to reorganize the state's public colleges and universities--and now there's disagreement between the Malloy administration and some top Democratic legislators over whether a deal for the restructuring has been reached.

"There were some outstanding issues that needed to be resolved before the House, Senate and governor could stand together and announce a budget deal. This was one of them. His plan for higher education is one of the centerpieces of the budget," said Mark Ojakian of the state Office of Policy and Management. "Had there been no agreement, I can tell you quite frankly that the governor likely would not have stood up there and agreed to a budget."

But several legislators close to the negotiations have a different recollection, and as a result, leaders of the Appropriations Committee have decided not vote the reorganization bill out of committee before their Tuesday deadline.

Legislators who attended budget meetings with the administration said they never agreed to Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's plan to combine the four-campus Connecticut State University System, the dozen community colleges, the online Charter Oak College and the Department of Higher Education under one Board of Regents. Collectively those institutions have nearly 100,000 students and 6,600 full-time staff. The University of Connecticut is not included in Malloy's proposed shakeup.

"I have agreed to nothing," Rep. Roberta Willis, the co-chairwoman of the legislature's Higher Education Committee told her co-chair following a meeting at the State Capitol Monday. Her committee approved the proposal last month, but with the expectation that the details would be fine-tuned in consultation with the administration.

That hasn't happened, she said, and now she has more concerns than before.

"They aren't willing to compromise," she said. Willis said she wants to know what jobs will be cut to achieve the projected $4.3 million in savings, why the reorganization has to happen before a strategic plan for higher education is complete and how the budgets and autonomy of the various institutions will be protected under the merger.

Rep. Gary Holder-Winfield, D-New Haven and a member of the Appropriations Committee, has a similar view.

"I've asked a lot of questions and have gotten very few answers. We need to see the plan first before we can agree on any sort of deal," he said. "Just because we all walked out of that room at the end of the meeting does not make it a deal."

Ojakian is in charge of the higher ed reorganization for the Malloy Administration. Asked why the budget released last week says that the reorganization "is not provided" and the institutions will remain separate entities, Ojakian said, "The budget had already gone to print."

Malloy said Monday creating one governing board "will go forward... We need to do something and we're going to."

Appropriations Committee members said just because the governor's reorganization will not make it out of committee, it does not mean that a compromise can not be reached in the coming weeks. The regular legislative session ends June 8.

"It just hasn't been made yet," said Sen. Toni Harp, D-New Haven, co-chair of the committee. "There are people who are not absolutely buying into that proposal and are not supportive."

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

Go Roberta! Don't be

Go Roberta! Don't be steamrolled by these men! You are the Norma Rae of the House of Reps! Nice to see someone who doesn't roll over.

It seems somehow cruel for a

It seems somehow cruel for a legislator to ask for the names of individuals who will lose their jobs under the Governor's proposed re-organization plan, even though these people make well above the average salary of $100,000 per year in these system offices.

But putting aside Rep. Willis's desire for the administration to name names, the call for a full-blown strategic plan for higher education seems more like a stalling tactic than a substantive request. Such plans take many, many months to fashion because of the broad range of stakeholders who have to have input for the plan to have

Read More

If Higher Education isn't

If Higher Education isn't part of the solution, don't expect concessions from the rest of the State employees. Higher Education is were all the employees are that making the BIG salaries and retirements!!!

Enough with the stalling

Enough with the stalling tactics, as Deepthought suggests above. Reorganizing higher ed should be done ASAP, and it's not rocket science to remove obvious managerial deadwood (who will walk away with fat pensions, etc.).

The Governor seems prepared to play hard-ball with the unions; in return, he should be more than willing to lay-off plenty of the higher-level managerial ranks (bloat) that have been twiddling their thumbs and watching their retirement funds/pensions grow for years and years. Let the deadwood go. It will save the state money, and it will benefit our students (who have been under-served by

Read More

It is the tax payers (as

It is the tax payers (as opposed to voters, that may also comprise of non-tax payers) who are funding these state funded higher educational institutions that should determine (as a matter of policy) which unit of the public institutions should have any "unique academic mission" (and how to curtail unnecessary duplication of the programs and hence useless courses) and it should then be the responsibility of the particular institution to sub-serve the directive of the state legislature, as the representative of the taxpayers. We can not afford these institutions to take it upon themselves to be the policy makers and

Read More

People really need to READ.

People really need to READ. UConn is not included in this proposal. The highest salaries and highest pensions of ALL state employees are paid to UConn faculty and retirees, not employees at the Community Colleges and the State Universities. Why isn't the governor going after and proposing a reorganization of UConn? The governor is claiming a $4mm savings by reorganizing higher education, but has not come forth with the details of that non-existant savings plan. This sounds more like a witch hunt than a serious plan to reorganize for the sake of improving higher education for the benefit of

Read More

This is an utter waste of

This is an utter waste of time and money unless those that be get off the notion that UConn be allowed to remain separate and apart because of their unique mission. UConn has been, and continues to be, the biggest waster of taxpayer money and everyone knows it. There's nothing special about UConn. Bigger? Yep. Research? Yep. Hospital? Yep. Doesn't matter... it's a tax-supported school and that makes it just like any other tax-supported school. Larry 'The Coach' McHugh will, of course, posture and puff and declare it otherwise but that's Larry. Let's not

Read More

This is a tremendous

This is a tremendous disappointment. While it is absolutely true that UConn should be included in the reorganization, the process MUST begin and it MUST begin now with the CCCs and the CSUs and their BIG, FAT central office administrations and top heavy management structures within the colleges/universities. There needs to be a trimming of programs and return to mission driven decision making.