Senate approves Malloy's first budget, 19-17

May 3, 2011

By Mark Pazniokas

The Senate voted 19 to 17 shortly after 3 a.m. today to pass and send to the House a $40.1 billion biennial budget loaded with a broad array of tax and fee increases that Gov. Dannel P. Malloy says are necessary to stabilize Connecticut's rocky finances.

Debate began at 4:18 p.m. Monday on a budget that sets Malloy, who was elected last year as the state's first Democratic governor in 20 years, apart from the nation's other governors by embracing nearly $2.6 billion in tax increases over the next two years. House approval is expected later today.

Senate budget debate

Sens. Toni Harp, Paul Doyle and John Kissel during a long debate.

Democrats Joan V. Hartley of Waterbury, Edward Meyer of Guilford and Gayle Slossberg of Milford joined all 14 Republicans in opposing the budget proposed by Malloy and revised by the Democratic majority.

"The senators who voted for this budget early this morning should be commended for making the tough decisions necessary to begin the process of getting Connecticut's fiscal house in order," Malloy said in a statement. "That was a tough vote to make, but it was the right vote to make. It was a vote for an honest budget, one that's balanced with no gimmicks, and one that will stabilize the state's finances and lead to our ultimate goal: job creation."

Malloy's staff says the budget, likely to become law by mid-week, is a testament to a new Democratic governor's willingness to make difficult choices to erase an inherited deficit of at least $3.2 billion, while the Republican minority leader, Sen. John P. McKinney of Fairfield, says it merely defines him as another "tax-and-spend liberal."

"It's the most fiscally responsible budget that has been put on the table by a governor in recent memory. That's how it defines him," said Roy Occhiogrosso, the senior adviser to Malloy.

Occhiogrosso said the budget preserves the social safety net and maintains state aid to municipalities, a contrast to the budgets offered by two neighboring governors, Republican Chris Christie of New Jersey and Democrat Andrew Cuomo of New York. Spending increases by about 2 percent in each year of the biennium.

But Republicans criticized the sheer variety of tax and increases, as well as their record total of $1.4 billion in the next fiscal year.

"You've given it to the monster of government," McKinney said of the new revenue.

Over 11 hours, it seemed that each GOP senator who rose to speak mentioned the record size of the tax increase, connecting the milestone to the Democrats' control of the legislature and governor's office for the first time in 20 years.

"I want to ask my Democratic colleagues if that is the legacy they want to write for themselves in resuming control?" said Sen. Joseph Markley, R-Southington, who helped organized a mass protest in 1991 against the passage of the income tax.

McKinney

Sen. Eileen Daily watches as Sen. John McKinney criticizes the Democratic budget.

A no-tax alternative budget offered by the Republicans was defeated at 12:28 a.m. today on a party-line vote, 22 to 14. It was the first of a series of GOP amendments destined to fail on party-line votes, included a proposal by Sen. Scott Frantz, R-Greenwich, to sunset every tax increase.

Under the Democratic budget, the sales tax jumps from 6 percent to 6.35 percent, and it will be applied to previously exempt items like non-prescription drugs, smoking-cessation products, drug grooming, cosmetic surgery, yoga classes, pedicures and manicures, and inexpensive clothing and shoes. One-tenth of one percent of the increase will go to municipalities.

"For the middle class, I guess the message would be, 'Hold onto your hat, we are going to tax you from head to toe--and everything in between,' " Sen. Andrew Roraback, R-Goshen, said on the Senate floor.

Senate Majority Leader Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven, said Connecticut was one of many states in fiscal crisis. "This budget does reflect a reasonable response to that crisis," Looney said.

Nearly $725 million of the increased revenues in the first year come from the income tax, while raising the sales rate will produce $138.4 million and eliminating the sales-tax exemption on clothing costing less than $50 raises another $128.1 million.

The bill also increases the sales tax to 7 percent on luxury items, defined as clothing costing more than $1,000, jewelry above $5,000, cars above $50,000 and boats above $100,000. It is projected to raise $3.6 million next year.

The excise tax on alcohol goes up by 20 percent, diesel fuel taxes jump from 26 cents to 29 cents per gallon, the levy on a pack of cigarettes rises by 40 cents to $3.40, and a new cabaret tax of 3 percent will be charged on admission, food and drink at any bar or club with live music. Under pressure from legislators, Malloy dropped his demand for a 3-cent-a-gallon increase on gasoline.

The budget also eliminates an exemption from the 10 percent admissions tax now enjoyed by more than a dozen arenas, ballparks and racetracks, plus the Connecticut Convention Center in Hartford.

Bannon

Tim Bannon, chief of staff, updates the governor during budget debate.

Income taxes go up as the state increases the number of tax brackets from three to six, with the top rate increasing from 6.5 percent to 6.7 percent. A single filer earning $50,000 will see his tax rate increase from 5 percent to 5.5 percent.

Most joint filers making between $50,000 and $100,000 would pay $200 more in income taxes annually, with the increase rising to $510 on an income of $125,000, $825 on $150,000, $900 on $200,000, and $1,400 on $250,000. At the high end, the tax hike would be $17,400 on $1 million and $19,400 on $2 million.

Fees would increase from $100 to $150 for a cremation, while the cost of a four-year drivers' license would go up from $44 to $48. A two-year car registration goes from $75 to $80.

The corporate tax surcharge would increase from 10 percent to 20 percent and be extended until 2012. It raises $46 million.

A temporary tax of 1/4 of a cent per kilowatt hour on electric generation facilities would raise $72 million in each of the next two years, then sunset in 2013.

The state would spend $110 million on an earned income tax credit for lower-income residents. In 2010, the maximum credit under the bill would have been $1,700 for filers who earned an adjusted gross income of $43,352 singly or $48,362 jointly and had three or more children.

By reducing the maximum property tax credit from $500 to $300, the state would save $150 million. By lowering the estate and gift tax threshold from $3.5 million to $2 million, the state would collect $22.4 million.

Senate President Pro Tempore Donald E. Williams Jr., D-Brooklyn, accurately predicted before the debate that the budget would pass with votes from 19 of the 22 Democrats in the Senate.

"I think this is a historic day for Connecticut," Williams said. "At the end of this day we will have passed a balanced budget in the Senate, sent it on the House and put Connecticut back on the path to economic recovery sooner than anyone would have imagined."

The administration said the combination of tax increases, selected spending cuts and a demand for $1 billion in labor savings in each of the next two fiscal years would erase the state's structural deficit.

But the leaders of the House and Senate Republican minorities, McKinney and Rep. Lawrence F. Cafero Jr. of Norwalk, told reporters before the debate they would offer a Republican alternative budget in each chamber that could balance the budget without tax increases.

They complained that the budget supported by Malloy and the Democratic legislative leaders raises so much in taxes it would leave the state with a surplus of about $1 billion over the next two years.

"To the extent there are surplus dollars, he would like to use them to continue to stabilize the state's finances," Occhiogrosso said.

Any surplus would be used to pay down the debt, replenish the rainy day fund or address the state's unfunded liabilities for pension and retiree health costs, he said.

In total dollars, the single-year tax increase is the largest in state history. Adjusted for inflation, the record belongs to the 1991 tax increase passed by the legislature at the insistence of Gov. Lowell P. Weicker Jr., an independent.

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

Did I miss that they

Did I miss that they legalized pot? Although the Don Williams quote seems more like a drunken one. Check your watch- er, I mean clothing, it's time to go!

$500 million surplus this

$500 million surplus this year; a billion dollars in surplus across the next two years. And still, we have to be taxed so heavily. I will say this: I will do my best to buy my gas out of state; will for sure buy my booze out of state and not attend any events in the state. Most of my purchases will be on line and I'll move my company across state lines too. Kiss my overtaxed ass.

As for Williams, this is the guy who last year, couldn't balance the budget without borrowing a billion dollars; or the

Read More

Very happy we live near the

Very happy we live near the MA line until we go. Haven't bought gas here in over a year- now north for everything. CT has been disintegrating for some time. Just sad.

Anyone who voted for a

Anyone who voted for a Democrat and was not a state employee/teacher or union membe in this state should have had their head examined. You got what you voted for. I commend Hartley, Meyer, and Slossberg for breaking ranks and voting NO! This budget sail through the House and will be on Malloy's desk in no time. Malloy is a smart politician. He demanded that the Democrats in the Senate push this budget through so the opposition could not mount their forces. I hope the Republicans challenge this budget in the Supreme Court. I'm

Read More

Last one out of CT, turn the

Last one out of CT, turn the lights off...

It's time for Connecticut to

It's time for Connecticut to STAND UP and SPEAK OUT!!! I don't like this sneaky voting at 3:00 a.m. What kind of government do we have in this STATE a bunch of losers! Those that voted for this bill are all going to stay home and sleep today (hiding out) just so they won't have to deal with the People that they failed!! Go ahead run and hide, we will remember you on how you voted a TAX INCREASE during very hard times for those of us struggling!

To Kathy. This is standard

To Kathy. This is standard operating procedure for the Democrats. They are betting that the electorate in Connecticut will forget. The fact is they are right. They take on these bitter issues right after they are elected so everyone will forget, and they do. This same exact thing happened in 1991 when they voted on the income tax.
In the next election every Democrat was re-elected except one. That person was Doreen DelBianco of Waterbury.
Her reward was a cushy state job that got her a very nice pension.

As long as we vote

Read More

Our irresponsible governor

Our irresponsible governor and Democrat legislature continue unchecked. People will leave our small state even more now to purchase goods and services, let alone moving out completely. And I noticed in an article elsewhere that Sen Len Suzio proposed an amendment to defund Planned Parenthood by 1 million dollars, for which he was belittled by Democrats and unsupported by Republicans. Thank goodness there are a few legislators with the courage to stand against the largest provider of abortion in the US. When are people going to wake up to the fact that we as a culture

Read More

If there is going to be

If there is going to be mention of an "irresponsible governor" then we'll have to bring in the real culprit: John Rowland. He was asleep at the wheel during his time in office except for keeping an eagle eye out for ways to enrich his cronies and himself. Then Rell had to keep things on track until turning over the whole mess to whomever followed her.
Malloy is doing a superb job so far with the mess Rowland/Rell left him.
And statistics and history prove that more affluent folk DO NOT leave states when taxes are raised slightly.

Read More

I under stand the budget has

I under stand the budget has increased spending 1 to 2% each year. I thought we had a deficit? Why would the instance Democrats INCREASE spending. So how much then is expected from the unions in cuts? What a joke this is and the state and legislature as both laughingstocks.

An advocate= we have had a

An advocate= we have had a Democrat controlled legislature for years. Yet you do not blame them for any of the mess. But they approve the budget. Obviously if Rell, Rowland were doing such a bad job, the Democrat controlled legislature should have stepped in, cut spending and restored sanity. SO where is that responsible legislature? The Dems have run this state for years and have run it off the cliff. We are ranked 47 as business friendly and I suspect we will be ranked at the bottom in the future. As far as tax freedom day, we are the

Read More

Lets be fair. Rowland and

Lets be fair. Rowland and Rell were not good governors but the legislature was controlled by the democrats when they were in office. All the budgets passed have been passed with democratic votes not republican votes. Democrats have had veto proof majorities most of the time. The governor proposes a budget but the legislature is the one that pass the budget.

Can someone explain the math?

Can someone explain the math? IF the state takes more of our money through income and sales taxes then we have less buying power. Seeing that one person spending is another persons income won't this lead to lower income and sales tax collections (ie if the state takes the money I would spend at a restaurant won't that restaurant and the people that work there have lower incomes)?

I can understand people are

I can understand people are frustrated, but...

Noteworthy: If you make purchases online, you are required by law to pay the use tax on your tax return. If you do not, you are breaking the law. You may not like the law, but you still are breaking it.

Noteworthy and Powers: If you go out of state to make purchases, you are just sending your tax dollars to other states. This only compounds the problem. As a smoker I understand this impulse, and it is legal, but if everyone does this then it just makes things worse.

Art: You cannot

Read More

Michael, All good points from

Michael, All good points from a sentimental viewpoint. I have lived in CT for all but a few of my years and remember when it was a state to be proud of. Unfortunately, those days are gone, possibly forever- at least for the foreseeable future. Services have become horrendous, our schools have gone off a cliff, spending is ridiculous and unrestrained in areas that don't pass the smell test. Integrity in our officials is scant at best locally all the way through Hartford and the apathy makes me sick.

In my view the slippery slope began with Weicker and

Read More

Powers, as I said, I can

Powers, as I said, I can understand the frustration. I have lived in many other states (Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado & Texas), and I have to say that I have found Connecticut to be a pretty decent place. It has its own share of problems, but they pale in comparison to some of the other places I have lived. Maybe I am a bit naive, but I think most of the people in Hartford are doing what they think is in the best interest of the state, even when they disagree about what that is. I know there are some

Read More

Naive it is.

Naive it is.

Michael The legislature is

Michael The legislature is taking $1.5 billion out of the economy. Most of this money would be spent locally ( food, energy, clothing etc). Time will tell but I believe that local business will get hurt as people have to cut back on spending when the state takes there money. In July our income , sales , property taxes will go up. Gas is going up every week. The economy depends on the consumer and the consumer is going or has already gone broke.

'The Democratic budget

'The Democratic budget increases spending $875.8 million, raises $2.6 billion more in taxes, assumes $2 billion in labor savings and concessions, and anticipates a $1 billion surplus.' Rep-am.com It seems to me when you have a deficit you cut spending. But in the Democrats mind you must increase spending. I can only conclude that the Democrats that voted for this budget are brain dead. And the voters who continually elect them are as well.