Tuition break for illegal residents advances--but how many will use it?

May 12, 2011

By Jacqueline Rabe Thomas

The state House of Representatives Thursday approved a bill to give undocumented residents in-state tuition at public colleges and universities, but advocates say they fear eligible students may be scared off by the requirement that they admit their illegal status.

The bill, approved 77-63 by the House, would require students to sign an affidavit confirming they live in the U.S. illegally and have applied for legal residency. Advocates say this formal admission will deter some students from coming forward, for fear that the affidavit would be used to deport them.

Candelaria

State Rep. Juan Candeleria: 'There is no social benefit for charging these students higher tuition'

Senate Majority Leader Martin Looney, D-New Haven and a champion on the proposal, said the requirement may have a "chilling effect" on participation rates.

"But many will be willing to go forward with that concern in the back of their mind," he said.

Nationwide, 10 states provide in-state tuition for undocumented students and almost all require students sign an affidavit, according to a report from the National Conference of State Legislators. Suman Raghunathan, who tracks immigration policy for the State Legislators for Progressive Immigration Policy, said the affidavit requirement does deter some students.

"Folks are concerned to submit this," said Raghunathan.

"There is fear this will be used in the wrong way. There is a culture of silence about this among those that are undocumented," echoed Lorella Praeli, an undocumented student at the private Quinnipiac College who is an advocate for giving in-state tuition to illegal residents. "There are many who are afraid to come forward."

Praeli, who moved to New Milford from Peru at 10 years old, is not one of them. While testifying before state legislators in March, she said that she is "unafraid and unapologetic" for supporting the in-state tuition bill. But about a dozen other students who testified during that same public hearing said they were speaking for friends who were afraid to come forward.

Lee Melvin, UConn's Enrollment Director, said during a recent interview he's not sure who will have access to these affidavits. He also said he does not know how the university would respond if asked by federal officials for these affidavits.

But Praeli and Raghunathan said it's important to note that the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has never gone after undocumented students in 10 other states that have passed similar measures over the last decade.

"I have never heard of that information being transmitted," said Raghunathan.

A amendment proposed by Republican legislators that would have required school officials to transmit affidavits to federal officials did not make it to the floor Thursday.

College officials estimate there are only a small number of undocumented students enrolled in the state's public colleges and universities, where tuition for in-state students is about a third that charged students from out-of-state.

But Republican lawmakers debating the bill in the House said they worry this proposal would greatly increase enrollment of undocumented students and reduce opportunities for legal residents--particularly at UConn, which is at capacity. The Connecticut State University System and some of the community colleges have space available.

"This could bump some of the legal residents. That's a consideration we can't overlook and can't ignore," said Rep. Timothy LeGeyt of Canton, the ranking Republican on the Higher Education Committee.

"There's winners and there's losers," agreed House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk. "Remember folks, when someone gets in, someone gets denied."

Supporters of the bill disagreed.

"Why are we afraid of these people?" asked House Majority Leader J. Brendan Sharkey, D-Hamden. "You still have to complete for your place... in that institution of higher education."

Rep. Juan Candelaria, D-New Haven and vice-chairman of the Higher Education Committee, said charging higher tuition from undocumented students hurts the state in the end.

"There is no social benefit for charging these students higher tuition," he said. "It deprives the state of that student's intellectual capacity."

Republican lawmakers also said they are concerned that the state will subsidize the education of people whose parents do not pay taxes. An amendment that would require the affidavit to include that students could only receive in-state tuition if their parents are state taxpayers failed along party lines.

"I maintain there will be taxpayer expenses," LeGeyt said.

A recent report by the legislature's non-partisan budget office said the bill won't necessarily increase higher education costs. The report says the state colleges and universities can adjust the ratio of in-state to out-of-state student as needed to make up for the lower tuition for undocumented students.

The state spent $1.1 billion for higher education last fiscal year, according to a report from the State Higher Education Executive Officers, or $8,450 for each full-time equivalent student.

The bill now heads to the Senate, where final passage is expected. Gov. Dannel P. Malloy has said he will sign the bill.

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

Are you kidding me? A legal,

Are you kidding me? A legal, albeit homeless, resident is punished for trying to get her son educated and an illegal can go to school at my expense. What part of illegal do the legislatures not understand???? Yes not the students fault but if they are smart enought to go to college, they can certainly pass the exam to become a citizen. Maybe the effort would be best spent on how can we make these people legal rather than how can we bend the law to accomodate illegals.

I suggest that the state

I suggest that the state legislatures pass a law to give keys to state's treasury chest to all illegals. This way they, the illegals, can take whatever monies they want from the state treasury, without stealing or robbing the banks. Would it not be wonderful to show our sympathy and empathy with the poor illegals? But still, let each legislator disgorge his or her assets to the poor illegals in this great "shared sacrifice".

We can not make the scofflaws

We can not make the scofflaws into legals. Let the illegals go back to the country of their origin and then apply for legal permits (if they are otherwise qualified under our laws) to come back to this country (USA) in due time . No back door amnesty please.

From the article: "Rep. Juan

From the article: "Rep. Juan Candelaria, D-New Haven and vice-chairman of the Higher Education Committee, said charging higher tuition from undocumented students hurts the state in the end.

"There is no social benefit for charging these students higher tuition," he said. "It deprives the state of that student's intellectual capacity."

Really? Are you REALLY serious Juan?
I mean, you have to be kidding right?
Too funny, the sarcasm, just toooo funny.......

The only thing that gets deprived here, Juan is the CT taxpayer of a few extra tax dollars to subsidize a student who is not even legal.

Eric Nelson: You should have

Eric Nelson: You should have asked Juan and other career politicians to disgorge their own assets (including illegal earnings) in the service of their constituents (in the words of Malloy this will be a first step in their "shared sacrifice"), before they come with a begging bowl (or still worse with a hammer) to seek tax dollars. How did they ever become chairs of these committees (you have to exhibit the qualities of Robin Hood or other dacoits and robberers). Oh, I forgot, we are a truly democratic nation. Are we not? There is always a quid pro quo

Read More

I watched this bill on CSPAN

I watched this bill on CSPAN - Half of the Representatives are not even paying attention to what is going on when these bills are put out and disputed on the floor. Candelaria, had to keep referring to the bill when asked any questions, the person sitting next to him was helping him with what the wording stated in the bill. He carried this bill to the floor, but could not snap out nor carry-out the bill with full-support, I found him stumbling with his answers for support on the bill.

What do expect our Cities are Sanctuary Cities

Read More