FARMINGTON--Officials of the state's community college system, a point of entry to higher education for thousands of low-income and non-traditional students, are considering ending the longstanding "open door" admissions policy because of a projected $44.3 million budget deficit over the next two years.
"We are caught between two numbers. We cannot afford to take in more students this year then we did last year," Win Oppel, a trustee for the Connecticut Community College System, told his colleagues Monday at Tunxis Community College. "We have the responsibility to put a cap" on enrollment.
Such a cap would put an end to the rapid enrollment growth the 12-campus community college system has experienced in recent years. Enrollment has grown by nearly 50 percent since 1998, from about 39,000 to more than 58,000 this year.
But community college officials have warned that diminishing support from the state has strained their ability to grow, and that the time will come where they will have to reconsider the policy of accepting everyone who applies. That time appears to be now.
Trustees will vote at their June meeting on a budget that provides no funding to hire more employees to teach additional students.
"We are going to put as many students in classrooms as academically appropriate," said Marc S. Herzog, chancellor of the college system. But the budget doesn't give him the option of hiring staff to accommodate more students.
"The community college system as we know it is going to end," David L. Cannon, a longtime trustee from Preston. "How are we going to continue to offer access under these unconscionable shortfalls? The open door is going to close."
Much of the blame for having to limit enrollment was placed on budget cuts approved by state legislators and Gov. Dannel P. Malloy. In addition to facing rising costs, the community colleges had their funding cut by $13.2 million over the next two years.
"If they want to fund us appropriately then we will accept everyone," said Oppel.
"These are some of the consequences of budget cuts. They are real," said state Sen. Beth Bye, D-West Hartford and co-chair of the Higher Education Committee. "I hope they do everything to accept every student possible."
A spokeswoman for Malloy shared that sentiment.
"While this is the first were hearing of this, in difficult fiscal times, everyone is being asked to do more with less. We hope it would impact student learning as little as possible," said Colleen Flanagan.
On top of the budget cuts, college officials said, the concession deal between the Malloy Administration and state employee unions compounds the problem by limiting staffing options. The deal includes provisions that are expected to result in about 1,000 workers' retiring this summer, with most not being replaced. It also protects those union workers who remain from layoffs.
"If a biology faculty retires we don't know that we are going to be able to replace them," said Herzog. The concessions agreement means the colleges can't lay off less essential workers to shift money to other areas.
"How do we do this without layoffs? That's going to be a real strengthening exercise for our system," Herzog said.
Community college officials also said they want to avoid raising costs for students beyond the 2.3 percent increase in tuition and fees approved by trustees earlier this year.
"We don't want to be balancing our budget on the back of our students," said Vicky Greene, the chief financial officer of the community colleges.
Mary Anne Cox, assistant chancellor of the community college system, said having an open-door application policy has long been a proud tradition of the state's community colleges, but said trustees have no choice now but to consider ending that.
"This is antithetical to the community college mission," she said.
A majority of students admitted directly by the state four year colleges (that may include UConn as well) and almost two-thirds of students that seek admission to state community colleges are not up to par and ready for higher education. These colleges are burdened with a variety of remedial course offerings, but such offerings are just that, and really do not perk up the knowledge base of the sub-par students. What we are ending up now is to produce useless paper degree graduates (educated illiterates) and waste our precious resources and assets.
As I have written previously, we should stop
Read MoreI believe in the community college system for every student who desires to further his or her education beyond high school. Education is a key element to the prosperity of our nation. I happened to be a product of a community college being a member of the second graduating class of Middlesex Community College. Back then tuition and fees were $125.00 p/semester. If a student made the "Deans List" tuition was waved the following semester. My second year of college was "free". I went on to complete a Bachelors and Masters Degree after graduation from
Read MoreThis article does not say explicitly how/where the open door will be closed. What does 'academically appropriate' mean? It suggests that the most under-prepared students will not be admitted. Is the bottom line test scores? There is a body of research related to 'ability to benefit,' is this what we're talking about? If so, how will the 'academically appropriate' score be determined? If a student is deficient in math, but not reading or writing is s/he appropriate? This will disproportionately impact minority students due to the achievement gap (more like an abyss).
How about considering thinning the
Read MoreWhat's the big deal? Yes, we are taking money away from the education of our least prepared students but we are going a save a $billion for a rainy day, build a $900 million bus route no one will use, we have $800 million or so in new and improved spending, we are gonna give uconn millions for a new med center, gubernatorial appointees are the highest paid in history, and so forth.
The administration wants to screw the state employees, why not the community college students too?
I agree with Art, Elaine, and Jen's points above.
And there is another issue: this idea to save money by eliminating community college entry to those who most need it is being presented by the "top administrators making six figures" (Art's words) who are also going to be losing their jobs in the Malloy "flattening" higher ed plan.
And so their ideas and their proposals are suspect on many levels.
These top administrators have been inactive for years; how curious that suddenly they spring into action.
We cannot deny community college entry to our most needy young people.
Read MoreI am not a top administrator. I do not make six figures. I would like for community colleges to be open to anyone interested in pursuing higher education. But college-level work is not for everyone, and our high schools continue to graduate students who are not prepared for college-level work. While it would be painful for those of us who believe in the community college mission, I suggest we cut loose those students who are not reasonably prepared for college, or who may never be, and focus the community colleges' limited resources on those that can benefit. This may be
Read MoreThe problem always lead back to the unions. Why are people graduating without a good education? The union teachers. It is impossible to get rid of the bad teachers because they are protected by the union. Why is service bad at the DMV? Because the union protects the workers who do a bad job. Same with all other departments. As long as the unions have the legislature in it's pocket nothing will change.
Larry, blaming the teachers is absurd. We are living in a society where our young people are bombarded with trashy media and technology 24 hours a day (cable television, the internet, cell-phones, texting, facebook, etc., etc.). Parents have a difficult job nurturing their children's literacy in the face of all the distractions young people are bombarded with, and teachers are left to pick up the pieces. Teachers cannot do it; it's impossible without the help of parents and without the help of the greater society. Our society just doesn't value teachers or public education. It's short-sighted
Read More