Prague: On advice from A.G., Senate gives up on 'captive audience' bill passed by House

May 27, 2011

By Mark Pazniokas

Legislators said Friday that Attorney General George Jepsen, a staunch ally of labor, effectively has killed a legislative priority of the Connecticut AFL-CIO by advising them that federal labor law appears to pre-empt the state from passing a "captive audience" bill.

The House of Representatives passed the controversial bill two weeks ago, 78 to 65, after an 11-hour debate in which the key sponsor, Rep. Zeke Zalaski, D-Southington, relied on a letter from Jepsen assuring him that the bill was legally sound.

An unhappy Zalaski said that Jepsen visited him earlier this week to inform him that additional legal research by his staff concluded that the state cannot bar employers from requiring employees to attend a meeting called to discuss religious or political matters.

"I just said, 'You couldn't tell me that before I did the bill?' " Zalaski said. "Come on, I gave it 11 hours."

Sen. Edith G. Prague, D-Columbia, the co-chairman of the Labor and Public Employees Committee, said that the Senate will not take up the bill in light of Jepsen's warning that the bill might not be legally defensible.

"That's it," she said. "We're not doing the bill."

But Senate President Pro Tempore Donald E. Williams Jr., D-Brooklyn, said the Democratic majority had not made "a hard or final decision" on whether Jepen's advice was reason to give up on the legislation, although the he acknowledged that prospects remain tenuous with a number of undecided votes.

Jepsen said the earlier letter on which Zalaski relied was not a formal legal opinion.

"My letter, dated May 5, was simply an affirmation of a prior, informal policy position and advice given in 2007 by former Attorney General Richard Blumenthal," Jepsen said in a statement released by his office.

"I am aware that substantial and serious legal questions about preemption have been raised concerning the positions taken in both the May 5, 2011 and (Blumenthal's) March 14, 2007 letters," he said. "My office is reviewing these legal issues.  It would be inappropriate for me to comment further publicly about it at this time."

Jepsen initially declined comment Friday, because his office might have to defend passage of the bill. But after Prague said the measure was dead, Jepsen his office had been approached before the House debate and affirmed Blumenthal's earlier view that the bill was legally sound.

The Connecticut Business and Industry Association circulated its own legal opinion that National Labor Relations Act pre-empts the state from addressing the issue. Jepsen ordered his staff to conduct a deeper review.

"I'm never afraid to take a second look," Jepsen said

Still, he declined to share exactly what he told legislators after that additional review.

Jepsen's position defuses a difficult political situation for the Senate and Gov. Dannel P. Malloy. With the passage of a paid sick days bill, the business community had stepped up its opposition to the captive-audience bill, calling it a blow to Connecticut's image among employers.

John Olsen, the president of the Connecticut AFL-CIO, said the statewide federation of unions would continue to press for passage in the Senate, saying a legal opinion is statement of what might happen in the fact of a court challenge, not a certainty.

"We believe the bill, from all kinds of standpoints, is defensible," Olsen said.

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

This is a most unusual

This is a most unusual position for the Attorney General to take. I don't believe that it has ever been established that Congress intended to occupy the entire labor relations field. Given the United States Supreme Court opinions on federal preemption over the past few years I would not be inclined to share the AG's opinion. More likely, after the paid sick days bill passed both houses and is destined to become law the death of this bill is more about appeasing business than the fear of federal preemption.

How interesting the Super

How interesting the Super Majority is at odds with a Democratic AG. How interesting that a new AG is bucking against something the King of AGs stated. Interesting.....

Now that the State of CT has fallen so out of line with the free market system, when is CBIA going to get tough on her? They need to put down the tickling feathers and get out the boxing gloves before there is no business left in this State - or taxpayers, for that matter.

As for constituents - get a grip and figure out just exactly how dangerous it

Read More

Hey... you... Zalaski. Why

Hey... you... Zalaski. Why don't you try cracking a book and doing your own research before you go and propose a bill? I guess it really doesn't matter that much to you though, huh? I mean... it was just another bill to further entrench this state as the laughing stock of the country.