Gov. Dannel P. Malloy unveiled one of the largest budget-cutting plans in recent history Friday, targeting more than 3,600 Executive Branch jobs for layoffs while eliminating funding for more than 6,500 jobs in total.
The governor's plan also carves deeply into social services and health care -- an area Malloy pledged to protect during last fall's campaign -- transportation, prisons and education while eliminating dozens of programs and closing numerous facilities.
Those changes also likely mean a new asset test for certain Medicaid patients, increased bus, rail and other transit fares, and a 1.5 percent cap on raises for unionized workers who weren't laid off.
Malloy also cut budgets for the Judicial and Legislative branches to save $43.2 million and $9 million respectively this year, estimating these branches would have to shed another 500 jobs beyond the 6,060 targeted in the Executive Branch.
But while legislative cost-cutting plans hadn't been announced yet, Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers announced over 600 additional job cuts and closure of the New Haven Juvenile Detention Center and several courthouses.
"We are entirely aware of the impact this plan will have on the lives of thousands of our fellow state employees and their families, and people across Connecticut who have become used to a certain level of services provided by state government," Malloy and Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman wrote in a joint statement Friday morning. "We will do our best to mitigate that impact. As everyone knows, this was not the path we chose, but at this juncture, it is the only path we can take. Connecticut is in the midst of the worst fiscal crisis it's faced in many, many years."
Besides cutting 4,328 Executive Branch jobs through layoffs and anticipated retirements, the governor's plan also cancels 133 temporary positions and eliminates 1,599 vacant posts.
The plan, prepared in response to a failed union concession deal that had been expected to save $1.6 billion over the next two years, drew a cautious response from the State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition, which is meeting Monday to consider new bylaws that would make it easier to adopt future concession deals.
"Our position remains the same: we need a new path forward," said SEBAC spokesman Matt O'Connor, who said union leadership remains committed to reaching a concession agreement with Malloy. "We all know we need a mutual agreement. The alternative is spelled out in the documents we see today. These would be catastrophic cuts to services and to the workers who deliver them. We would see a degradation of the quality of life in Connecticut."
The governor, who said repeatedly last fall that "we're not going to shred the safety net," cut $159.3 million this fiscal year from the departments of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Social Services, Public Health, Children and Families, and Developmental Services.
Those cuts alone represent 22.6 percent of Malloy's entire $700 million budget-balancing effort for 2011-12. They also lost just under 1,600 positions combined. But it's also not too surprising given that the five agencies represent 42 percent of this year's $20.14 billion budget.
Malloy took aim at one of state government's single-largest expenditures, the Medicaid program that provides an array of health care services to poor residents.
The administration would limit eligibility in Medicaid for Low Income Adults, which provides health services to poor adults without children. It would limit coverage to those with assets below $25,000 starting with the 2012-13 fiscal year. Currently, a person's assets are not taken into account when determining eligibility, one reason that officials have cited in the dramatic growth of the program in the past year.
The program began last year when the state converted the state-administered general assistance program, or SAGA, to Medicaid, allowing it to generate federal matching funds. Officials had expected the move to save the state money, but the increased caseload - it has grown by 57 percent in the past year - has cost the state more than expected, and stems in part from the removal of the $1,000 asset limit that had applied in SAGA. The administration is also proposing to count family income in determining a person's eligibility for the program.
Office of Policy and Management Secretary Benjamin Barnes, Malloy's budget director, defended the move, noting that the Low-Income Adults program recently was opened to 18- and 19-year-olds, some of whom have turned out to be students from families with sufficient resources to meet their health care needs without public assistance.
"We believe that these are very reasonable limitations on the program," he said.
The administration expects the changes would save $30 million a year, but does not anticipate any savings from this fiscal year because making the change requires permission from the federal government, which can be a lengthy process.
Another change likely to be controversial is a restructuring of Medicaid rates paid for physician services, behavioral health and durable medical equipment, which is projected to save $7.7 million this fiscal year and $10.1 million the next. Patient advocates say rates paid to Medicaid providers are already low, discouraging them from participating in the program and making it harder for patients to access care.
Community health centers and school-based health centers, which serve many low-income patients, would also see their state funding reduced. Community health centers would see a cut of $2.6 million in state funding each year, which the plan notes could limit the ability to maximize federal funding. School-based health centers would lose $1.3 million each year, which the budget document says will lead to reductions in staffing, hours of service and services at the clinics.
The position cuts at DSS include 17 temporary jobs for retired workers who have been helping to address the high error rates in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps. Federal officials have warned that the state could face financial sanctions if its performance in administering the program is not improved. Terminating the 17 positions early is projected to save $177,559.
DSS also expects to save money by re-estimating funding levels for certain services. Expenses were lower than budgeted for the state-funded portion of the Connecticut Home Care Program for Elders, and the department expects to save more than $13 million a year from re-estimating its cost while still providing enough funding to accommodate modest growth in the caseload. Similarly, the department expects to save $3 million a year by re-estimating savings from reducing the volume of dental services adults in Medicaid can get in a year.
A state-run Birth-To-Three program, a popular early intervention, school readiness program that serves about 305 clients, would be eliminated. This cut would not affect 43 other Birth-To-Three programs that are privately operated under contract with the state.
The Department of Developmental Services would delay placement of clients into group homes when vacancies occur, saving $720,000 per year. A budget document noted that the proposal is being made "although these vacancies are often critical to meeting the needs of clients who can no longer live at home."
The Department of Public Health would reduce funding for HIV prevention services, including testing, prevention intervention, housing and emergency financial assistance. At the same time, the state would delay a waiver for home and community-based services for people with HIV and AIDS that would provide case management, homemaker services, respite and other services until July 1, 2012.
Other safety net cuts include:
Though not considered part of the traditional social services "safety net," programs for Connecticut veterans were scaled back in several areas as the Department of Veterans Affairs lost $4.7 million and 55 positions this year. Therapeutic, recreational, laboratory testing, and on-call health care all were reduced, while the state cut from $100 to $75 the subsidy it provides to help veterans' families install special grave markers.
The two largest agencies within the Special Transportation Fund, the Transportation and Motor Vehicles departments, absorbed a total cut of nearly $100 million and 1,075 positions this year.
The Pay-As-You-Go program, a new initiative started by Malloy to repair transportation infrastructure with life spans of 20 years or less, lost more than $15.6 million in funding this year, while another $166,000 would be saved by inspecting state bridges less frequently.
The plan orders a 15 percent rate hike on the Metro-North commuter rail service line linking New Haven and Manhattan, and a 14 percent hike on the Shoreline East rail service. Weekend service on Shoreline East was canceled while a $2.7 million subsidy cut for statewide bus service is expected to take 40 buses and 50 transit employees out of operation -- ultimately reducing services. Night bus service in Waterbury also was canceled entirely.
The administration eliminated the Dial-A-Ride program for all non-disabled patrons while also cutting subsidies for bus, rail and transit services for the disabled by 10 percent, likely forcing a corresponding increase in rates for those passengers.
And seasonal ferry passenger service across the Connecticut River would end, both the Rocky Hill-to-Glastonbury ferry and the Chester-to-Hadlyme connection.
Leaders of the legislature's Democratic majority were relatively restrained in their comments about the plan, backing the Democratic governor and saying that while the cuts are painful, it is more essential than ever that state employee unions adopt a concessions package.
"If you talk to any legislator they will tell you they don't like these cuts," Senate President Pro Tem Donald E. Williams Jr., D-Brooklyn, said. "But unless the state employees have a second vote and ratify the concessions, there are few alternatives -- and the alternatives aren't appealing as well."
The spokesman for House Speaker Christopher G. Donovan, D-Meriden, said Democratic lawmakers still tentatively plan to have the Appropriations Committee review the cuts at an Aug. 15 public hearing. But spokesman Douglas Whiting also said that while "the speaker believes these cuts would do great harm to the state, he thinks the best and most responsible solution is for the governor and SEBAC (State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition) to find a way to reach an agreement."
Leaders of the Republican minorities in the House and Senate did not comment on the Malloy plan Friday afternoon.
Plans to close two state prisons were announced earlier this week, but several other areas tied to public safety also were targeted for reductions.
Word also leaked out earlier this week about plans to eliminate 57 state trooper posts, reducing the overall trooper force to 178 below the statutorily mandated level of 1,248.
Municipal fire departments took a hit in the plan when Malloy cut 10 percent of the funding for the state's nine fire training schools, a move expected to save $23.1 million this year.
And the administration also plans to eliminate 13 new or vacant positions in the Division of Criminal Justice while laying off another 62 employees.
Meanwhile, the Judicial Branch announce layoffs for 452 employees, about two-thirds from court operations and another third from court support services. Among the positions reduced were clerks, interpreters, court monitors, family relations counselors, mediators and law library staff.
Besides closing the New Haven Juvenile Detention Center -- the oldest of three such centers under branch jurisdiction -- and ordering a major court closure and reorganization plan, branch officials also ordered several other programmatic cuts, eliminating:
The new Department of Energy and Environmental Protection received funding cuts for mosquito control, emergency spill response, clean air and solid waste management programs while funding for the Operation Fuel heating assistance program was eliminated entirely.
The administration also found several new areas to save money in just over one month since the new biennial budget was adopted.
New cost estimates for providing state employee health insurance -- before layoffs and other job reductions were applied -- should save $36.4 million this year, while other health care efficiencies involving services to Medicaid and Husky patients should save another $12.4 million.
State buildings will be a little dirtier and a little less protected. The plan cuts $400,000 from security and $280,000 from maintenance. Many state buildings now will be staffed only between 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., saving another $410,000.
And by canceling or changing technology contracts and consolidating emergency phone lines, the governor hopes to save another $1 million each year.
The huge reduction in the state workforce is expected to translate into significant savings in providing benefits over the next two fiscal years.
The layoffs and retirements will cut fringe benefit costs by $16.4 million this year and by nearly $57 million in 2012-13.
The administration also hopes to save $42.6 million included in the original budget for raises tied to new contract awards this year. Malloy's plan calls for any new contracts with bargaining units to limit general wage hikes to 1.5 percent, though most state bargaining matters are resolved in arbitration.
The state's nine watchdog agencies, who were merged into the controversial new Office of Governmental Accountability during the regular legislative session, would lose $982,560 and another 11 positions. But the plan was unclear how those staffing cuts would be apportioned among divisions handling ethics, elections enforcement, freedom of information issues, and other watchdog functions.
Malloy, who was challenged last month by Senate Minority Leader John P. McKinney, R-Fairfield, to lead by example and cut his own staff, did cut funds for the governor's office, Wyman's office, and the Executive Branch's chief budget agency.
But it was not immediately clear how many employees might be laid off.
Malloy's plan cut $255,880 from personal services within the governor's office. But the budget narrative says this "could result" in the elimination of three full-time staffers and possibly one or more part-timers.
The cut to Wyman's office, which is one of the smallest in state government, involves $170,000 and eliminates two already vacant positions.
Meanwhile, the Office of Policy and Management, the governor's budget agency, loses $2.3 million from its personal services account. But that the narrative says that reflects "attrition, funded vacancies and layoffs," it doesn't specify how many of the latter occur.
As all can now see clearly, Malloy has back tracked on more campaign promises by his unwillingness to listen to alternatives. He has proven to be untrustworthy and a disgrace of a Governor when it comes to open government. His intimidation practices border on violating Federal Labor laws and focus on union busting. SEBAC has also proven to be untrustworthy and appears to be selling out the very fundamentals it was organized for. They too have lost sight of the big picture with their members. They have attempted to skew numbers, and have held closed
Read MoreWay to go Malloy, let's cut 3200 jobs nut keep all of the double dippers!! Instead of decimating services to those who most need them, why not first stop all double dipping which could save some jobs. Malloy also keeps saying this is that last thing he wants to do, if that were true he would gladly meet with the unions to negotiate for savings, instead he acts like a bully with the mantra of do it my way or no way..... I again ask you Governor, what sacrifices are you making financially, the answer (nothing)....
I'm sorry but this is unacceptable. No Birth to Three, Basically no more DDS family services. No more housing for DDS clients who are mentally retarded have medical issues and have no other place to live is just dispicable. Where shall they go, to the Governors Mansion I say! This is so wrong! This all could have been avoided if concessions were met. Well at least 6000 of you will be feeling the same pain without jobs as DDS clients will feel without family services and housing for the mentally handicapped. Well, I guess
Read MoreIt's too bad that a "political" point had to be made at the cost of the most vulnerable. It's also too bad that the concessions state employees were willing to offer were met with a "my way or the highway" policy. Make no mistake that state employees weren't part of these cuts. Where to cut and what to cut was not given to us to decide because if it were the magic bus, UCONN's facility and the 47 million to CIGNA would probably be good place to begin. Big business over human lives...sick, truly sick.
Let's see. Our national economy went into the toilet because of two lengthy wars(not arguing whether we should have been in them or not, just pointing out their existence) not only not raising taxes to pay for them, but actually cutting taxes for the wealthy, keep oil prices artificially low, letting Wall Street "run amok" with crazy, greedy investments, bailing them out so that the insanity does not kill the economy, cutting government services to the bone, and giving China the upper hand on our dollar by taking low interest loans from them...Talk about trickle down... Now the
Read MoreIf bus service is being cut why do we need a busway.
We could cut: Busway and put the hospital off to better days. Drivers and cars for elected officials. Longevity payments and overtime in pensions which the Dems in the legislature wouldn't allow cut. Senior mgt takes a 15% pay cut, and regular workers 10%. More contributions to health and convert all pensions to 401k types with state contributions. No retiring before 60 for anyone. No hiring for 5 years. THought they had a vacancy list of 1000-that can go. Get rid of useless committees that do not pay
Dear Readers,
I have been devoted to speaking up on this site, especially to those who are new.
I am a state employee of about 9 years and today, i found out that it is unlikely that my position will be cut. For now anyways...
I am dont feel that anyone has the right to use the word we when they are the sole person commenting. I can tell you that from what I have seen so far, the cuts have been across the board.
I dont think that services to the poor should be cut
Read Morecatwoman3,
Could you possibly be more out of touch? If people are angry with Malloy it's because they hear he's willing spend money on a bus to nowhere, the UCONN facility and giving 47 million each to the first 5 business that employ 200 people or more. Are you kidding me? Cut human services and then to SPEND that money on businesses who might employ a mere fraction of the people he's willing to layoff is unconscionable in my opinion. And while were on the subject of things that make you go "huh?" is the laying off state troopers
How many layoffs at OPM? Four, none of whom are political appointees. Meanwile the political staff in Barnes own office continues to grow.
I don't think that Malloy needs to go gun ho and basically shut down vital services just so he can be the Govenor that got rid of CT's DEBT. Regardless of what the economy did to CT, this mess is between two egos, The Union and The Govenor and its at the cost of hurting the innocent citizens now, the CHILDREN. It's unacceptable!!
What is the name of the game, SEBAC and Malloy? Threaten with layoffs, make State employees feel guilty for not sacrificing over the weekend, then announce a change in bylaws on Monday in order to re-vote on the concessions? How dare you play with peoples lives like this! There will be NO LAYOFFS because SEBAC will be a big hero on Monday pulling a rabbit out of the hat. I'm impressed!
"As if", I think if you actually read my comment carefully you will see that I am speaking generally, not specifically. I don't agree with everything in the plan B budget Malloy has, but that is not my point, which you apparently missed. It is also obvious that I am not out of touch, as I am following the issue closely, but in my own way, not yours. I feel bad for you that you feel the need to be rude in your reply, although I agree with a few of the points you make.
To Cheif,
What is missing from your arguments is exactly what you voted no for. The changed in pension would not have effected you, so was it for the wage freezes, or the healthcare plan? I have been a state employee for a while and have seen the same wage freezes, and I gave back nothing that would make or break me. It would seem that if the wage freezes that they were asking for here were going to have a severe impact on anyone then it would be time for that person to
Read MoreTo Sue,
I am a DDS employee, and for the most part myself and co workers are members of 1199, and we voted by a 2-1 margin in favor of the concessions. Unfortunately we had to vote along with other unions who had no interest in anything else then their own needs. We are hoping that the coalition of unions will channge the bylaws so that we can find a way to put a stop to this.
To State employee from another state employee,
Why are you so convinced that there will be no layoffs?I mean didn`t they happen in 03? Some agencies were able to escape that, but others were not. Although many got called back, I think there were also some permanant losses in 94 as wel were there not? How are you getting this information there will be no layoffs?????