SEBAC lowers concession vote threshold to majority

July 18, 2011

By Keith M. Phaneuf and Mark Pazniokas

State employee union leadership voted today to ease the rules for ratifying contract concessions, clearing the way for the unions and the administration of Gov. Dannel P. Malloy to reach a new deal to avoid mass layoffs and deep budget cuts.

Simple majorities now will be required for ratification: eight of 15 unions must vote in favor, and their membership must represent a majority of the unionized workforce. Under previous rules, ratification required the support of 14 of 15 unions representing 80 percent of members.

A previous tentative agreement to save $1.6 billion, as calculated by the administration, won support from 11 of the 15 unions, with 57 percent of participating union members voting yes. It fell short of the stricter ratification rules.

Union spokesmen Matt O'Connor, Leo Canty

"If the same units vote the same way, under the rules it would pass," Eric Bailey, a spokesman for the unions, said of a new deal.

The new bylaws had to be adopted by a two-thirds vote of the leadership of the State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition, but Bailey declined to release the exact vote, calling it an internal matter.

Sgt. Andrew Matthews, president of the Connecticut State Police Union, said he was unable to attend, but his designee was instructed to abstain. But Matthews, whose union voted against the first concession deal, also said, "I think it would be a good thing to allow the membership to vote on another proposal."

To immediately change the bylaws, the SEBAC leadership first had to vote to suspend rules that otherwise called for a 30-day waiting period.

SEBAC reported the change today on its website, then dispatched two spokesmen, Matt O'Connor and Leo Canty, to the state Capitol to brief reporters.

"The most fundamental principle of democracy is majority rules. There is a recognition of that in the changes that were adopted," O'Connor said.

Malloy, who was traveling to Connecticut from the annual meeting of the National Governors Association in Utah, issued a statement welcoming the news, but reiterating he is open only to clarifying the previous tentative agreement, not re-negotiating the terms.

"It's good news that the unions have changed their ratification process to one that respects the will of the majority. Over the next few days Mark Ojakian will be speaking with SEBAC leaders to understand which issues in the agreement need to be clarified," Malloy said.

Ojakian represented Malloy in the previous negotiations.

"Given the limited number of issues that have been identified as problematic, it shouldn't take more than a couple of days to have a clarified agreement that's ready to be voted on by all state employees," Malloy said.

Technically, the unions and Malloy could reach a new tentative agreement identical to the previous one. More likely, is that they will agree on new language addressing employee concerns about changes to their health-care benefits.

O'Connor and Canty said SEBAC leaders already have an "outline" of suggested changes and are to meet again Tuesday. Canty said speed is essential.

"After July 1, the whole process became a little more complicated, because pay raises were put in place," Canty said. "We have to figure out how to deal with that particular issue."

Another potential complication: the layoffs of some employees take effect in two weeks; once laid off, they cannot vote to ratify a new deal.

Legislative leaders express relief at the prospect of seeing layoffs averted.

"I'm glad to see the SEBAC leadership took a responsible action to reflect the will of the majority of employees," House Speaker Christopher G. Donovan said, adding that "I'm hopeful that an agreement with the governor can be achieved soon."

Without a new deal, the legislature would have to accept the deep budget cuts Malloy announced Friday or return to Hartford in special session to make their own cuts.

"I literally prayed for days for something like this to happen," said Sen. Edith G. Prague, D-Columbia, co-chairwoman of the Labor and Public Employees Committee and a longtime labor advocate who chastised SEBAC members for not ratifying the first deal. "Plan B, all of those layoffs, would have been a disaster for everyone."

Senate President Pro Tem Donald E. Williams Jr., D-Brooklyn, and Majority Leader Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven, called Monday's announcement "the news Connecticut has been waiting on for weeks.

"Union leaders should be commended for working together to change their bylaws and helping to facilitate the potential for a successful vote by union members. Approval of the concession package is critical for Connecticut's fragile economy. We urge union leaders to quickly get clarification on any needed items, call for another vote and for all union members to vote yes. This is Connecticut's last - and best - chance to resolve its fiscal crisis without undermining its recovery."

House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk, said the SEBAC announcement was "good news," but it now was essential for Malloy to define what he meant when he said he wouldn't renegotiate a new deal, but would help the unions to clarify the original package.

"It remains to be seen what ‘clarifying' means," said Cafero, who has said he believes the $1.6 billion savings projection from the original deal was inflated considerably.

Cafero specifically questioned a $441 million, two-year savings estimate for a controversial value-based health plan that hopes to promote wellness among state workers, and would penalize those who skip regular physicals and health screenings with a higher premium and deductible.

The GOP leader also doubted the administration's assertion that, working with employees, it can find $345 million in cost-aving ideas tied to technology, health care, and other government services, over two fiscal years.

The legislature's nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Analysis reported back on June 6 that it could vouch for less than 40 percent of the $1.6 billion in labor savings because of unanswered questions or insufficient data.

The second-highest-ranking Republican in the Senate, Leonard A. Fasano, said he also hopes for a fiscally sound concession deal, but remains "very skeptical of the projected savings" from the package rejected in June.

Fasano also said the budget-balancing plan Malloy ordered on Friday, which cut funding for more than 6,500 jobs, "was designed to make people nervous" and could have been devised with fewer position cuts. "I think he used his bully pulpit to be a bully," Fasano said.

The 11 unions to vote yes:

New England Health Care Employees Union, District 1199/SEIU, representing 7,700 nurses, doctors, social workers, technicians and others in a various of agencies and facilities, including the UConn Health Center.

AAUP at the University of Connecticut, representing 2,000 faculty and researchers at the main campus in Storrs and regional campuses in West Hartford, Waterbury, Torrington, Stamford and Avery Point.

Connecticut Association of Prosecutors, representing 260 state prosecutors.

Connecticut Federation of School Administrators, representing 61 principals and others at 18 vocational technical high schools.
Connecticut Police and Fire union, representing about 900 public-safety personnel across state government, with the exception of state police officers.
AFT Connecticut, representing 6,800 employees in higher education, health care, vocational education and other areas.
AAUP in the Connecticut State University system, representing 1,150 faculty, counselors and others.
AAUP at the UConn Health Center, representing 550 faculty.
Administrative & Residual Union, representing 3,300 state administrative workers.
Congress of Community Colleges, representing 2,000 faculty and professional staff.
CSEA/SEIU Local 2001, representing 3,900 workers, ranging from bridge inspectors to state police supervisors.

The 4 unions to vote no:

Connecticut Employees Union Independent, representing 4,500 maintenance and service employees.
AFSCME Council 4, representing 15,600 employees across state government, inlcuding correction officers, social workers, higher-education administrators, and clerical workers.
Connecticut State Police Union, representing 1,150 troopers, sergeants and master sergeants.

IBPO/SEIU Local 731, representing 750 judicial marshals.

Please login or register to post comments

Comments

This is wonderful news.

Submitted by Helen on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 2:21pm.

This is wonderful news. Thanks go out to the 15 Sebac members and to the brilliant Dan Livingston. Also to Matt O'Connor and Larry Dorman for doing a particularly great job as press spokesman.

While a gentlemen's

Submitted by realkook on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 2:24pm.

While a gentlemen's agreement between the state workers' unions and the government is always preferred, the changes now made by Sebac gloves to fit the hands of Malloy will smell rotten fish for a long time to come. I thought that we learnt only the saying, "if they don't fit, then acquit".

Well its about time. Now lets

Submitted by CDOT Engineer on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 2:29pm.

Well its about time. Now lets get this over with.

This is about as surprising

Submitted by douglaswill23 on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 2:33pm.

This is about as surprising as the sun coming up this morning. Bullying works!

You don't like the

Submitted by dantram on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 2:34pm.

You don't like the outcome.......change the rules.

if they don't fix the

Submitted by vic8432 on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 2:50pm.

if they don't fix the healthcare the agreement will still fail, so don't start patting yourself on the back just yet helen. You've been wrong before.

This is an absolute joke.

Submitted by bunny06 on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 3:07pm.

This is an absolute joke. What do we vote on the same garbage as last time or will they tweak it so the garbage smells better. We had a vote the votes were counted you do not like the outcome change the rules and vote again. I wonder if there is anything we can do about this.

In the next few years we will

Submitted by bunny06 on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 3:18pm.

In the next few years we will see what a piece of garbage this really is. And everyone will be crying and we will be stuck with it. We voted votes were counted the votes should stand. Let malloy close courts and lay off people. He would not have the guts to do it. He is not going to bite the hands that feed him. Unions & welfare queens.

SEBAC--and the Malloy

Submitted by victor perpetua on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 3:36pm.

SEBAC--and the Malloy administration--knew that this was a great deal for us unionized employees, for reasons that are obvious, if apparently unpersuasive to many who voted to reject. SEBAC--and the Malloy administration--must also have known that there was no way 80% of the membership would approve. It's an unrealistically high threshhold. Eighty percent of the membership probably couldn't have agreed that the world is round. Which explains why it took so little time for 2/3 of the SEBAC representatives to change the voting rules. It was all scripted in advance. Malloy got to look tough, and SEBAC looks like it

Read More

Of course, this development

Submitted by Aristotle on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 3:44pm.

Of course, this development comes as no surprise. Our union representatives have been de facto agents of the Malloy administration since before they took office. Certain people with personal interests at stake in the outcome of the vote were not going to let the rules get in the way. I only hope that the rank-and-file are smart enough to change the union leadership as soon as possible. I don't hold out much hope, however. As for the "deal" itself: you can dress it in a calico dress, put lipstick on it and call it Helen; but at the end of the day a pig is still a pig.

SEBAC lowers concession vote threshold to majority

July 18, 2011

By Keith M. Phaneuf and Mark Pazniokas

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Comments

Quote / Unquote

Letter from the Editor

Proud Supporters ofThe Connecticut Mirror

Connecticut

Proud Supporters of
The Connecticut Mirror