Malloy, legislature, make a big dent in inherited debt

July 22, 2011

By Keith M. Phaneuf

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and the legislature may be struggling to balance the budget in the face of uncertain union concessions, but they've made considerable headway in attacking $1.8 billion in debts their predecessors authorized to keep operations afloat in their last year in office.

According to the Office of Policy and Management, the projected General Fund surplus for last fiscal year -- which ended June 30, but the books won't close officially for another month -- has jumped another $73 million and now approaches $159 million.

And though $14.5 million of that must be deposited in the trust fund for retiree health care, $144 million is available to get a head start on paying off a $1.2 billion debt the 2009 legislature and then-Gov. M. Jodi Rell created, despite having nearly $1.4 billion still in the bank at the same time.

The Malloy administration and the legislature already managed to avoid another $647 million in borrowing that their predecessors had built into the last state budget. That borrowing target -- originally $956 million, but whittled down to $647 million before Rell left office -- would have been paid off with eight years of surcharges on monthly electricity bills and raids on an energy conservation fund. But it became unnecessary largely due to increases this past spring in income, sales and other tax revenues.

"I think we were all pretty clear on the need to avoid or retire debt," Rep. Patricia Widlitz, D-Guilford, co-chairwoman of the legislature's Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee. Though some lawmakers talked informally about using the added revenues to increase spending, a consensus clearly recognized that the economy still hasn't recovered fully from the last recession with unemployment still above 9 percent.

"Every day you hear something about jobs being lost somewhere," she said, calling the "First Five" and other job creation programs launched under Malloy this year "a bright light. But we're still not out of the woods."

The latest surge in the surplus projection for the past fiscal year also stems in part from rising revenues from taxes and fees, Secretary Benjamin Barnes of the Office of Policy and Management wrote in his agency's monthly budget report to Comptroller Kevin P. Lembo.

Revenue projections for corporation and real estate taxes, as well as from licenses, permits and fees, are up a combined $20 million from last month, Barnes wrote, while expectations for federal aid were increased another $13.4 million. Projected cost-saving efforts in various agencies also were increased by another $26.4 million.

The nearly $1.2 billion debt was ordered in June 2009 when Rell and the last legislature wanted to close a $950 million hole in the 2008-09 finances without breaking into the state's $1.38 billion emergency reserve, commonly known as the Rainy Day Fund.

With tax revenues shrinking rapidly and budget deficits expanding amid the recession, Rell, a Republican, and the Democrat-controlled legislature couldn't reach agreement on a long-term solution, opting against both hefty tax hikes and deep spending cuts. And by borrowing to close the 2008-09 budget, they were able to keep the entire Rainy Day Fund to artificially prop up declining tax revenues in the last two annual budgets of their term.

Not only did Rell and the last legislature borrow $950 million to close the 2008-09 deficit, but they borrowed another $78 million to cover the first two years' worth of payments on that loan - effectively pushing the entire job of repaying the debt onto Malloy and the new legislature, most of whose members were in office when those decisions were made.

Bond issuance and interest costs associated with that exercise pushed the total debt to just under $1.2 billion.

Connecticut is scheduled to make the first of five annual payments of $238 million each this fiscal year. The additional funds from the 2010-11 surplus will allow state government to pay more than $380 million of that $1.2 billion debt off this year.

The legislation authorizing the borrowing also stipulated that future surpluses had to be used to help reduce that debt. But similar mandates have been swept aside through legislation in the past.

Lembo warned earlier this month that despite the 2010-11 surplus and successful efforts to mitigate debt to date, Connecticut still needs "significant budgetary reform to permanently repair" its finances.

Besides continuing to dedicate any future surpluses to reduce debts, legislators also should reconsider a proposal to increase the maximum balance in the Rainy Day Fund, from 10 to 15 percent of annual operating costs, Lembo said. The comptroller offered that proposal last legislative session but it wasn't taken up by either the House or Senate.

Lembo also wants new controls requiring monthly deposits into the reserve, rather than one at fiscal year's end, whenever projected savings exceed a threshold level.

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

$1.5 billion in new taxes and

$1.5 billion in new taxes and almost no cuts in spending, so glad they can pat themselves on the back. Most if not all of them created the problem.

If I read the article right

If I read the article right it said that"thought some lawmakers talked informally about using the added revenues to increase spending". WHAT!!
That is what got this state in trouble. Spend Spend Spend. They should be layed off, fired just whatever. I can not believe it. You are talking about laying off 6000 employees and these &*^%^&*% want to spend any new found monies. We need to find out who they are and just wait till the next election. Vote them out. Even better just get rid of them faster than the next train out of town. I'm disgusted.

When looking at ways to save,

When looking at ways to save, perhaps take the position that agencies are responsible for what they do and if they don't perform then remove the leadership. Instead we have well paid managers who have to go through lower paid staff at other agencies to get anything done which means inefficiency and more workers needed and inflames the taxpayers. How about giving up Lincoln's Birthday as a holiday which almost every other entity has since Presidents' Day was created as one February holiday instead of the former two holidays. One less holiday for every State employee has to mean a

Read More

Making a dent? Seriously? All

Making a dent? Seriously? All i remember hearing is that the current budget is almost $1 billion MORE than the last budget (something like $17b previuosly and $17.9b now). Yet somehow we are in DIRE financial shape if the the state employees don't agree to 1) either give up the right to make their own healthcare decisions or pay an extra $1,200/year for the same coverage, 2) go 2 more years without annual increases(like the almost $700 million concession deal 2 years ago) since it seems that only tax rates can raise, and 3) stay on the payroll longer before

Read More

Inherited? You mean inherited

Inherited? You mean inherited from themselves???

And all it took to make a dent was to raise enormous amounts of taxes and further poison the business climate in this state?

That's just fabulous.

Who wrote this headline. The

Who wrote this headline. The legislature inherited this debt. What have you done hired someone from the courant to write your headlines