ConnCAN's Johnston leaving divided opinions as he moves on

August 4, 2011

By Jacqueline Rabe Thomas

Six years after launching what's become the highest-profile education reform group in the state, ConnCAN's controversial leader is moving on--and leaving Connecticut's education system pretty much the way he found it.

"We have not kept up the reforms other states are doing," Alex Johnston said in an interview at his New Haven office. "We have a system that has been static for far too long."

That's not for lack of an ambitious agenda on Johnston's part. The list includes drastically expanding funding for alternatives to the traditional public schools, launching teacher evaluations based in part on student performance, and ending the practice of laying off the newest teachers when budgets are tight simply because they have the least seniority.

Johnston photo

ConnCAN's Alex Johnston talks with gubernatorial candidate Tom Foley before an education forum between the candidates hosted by his organization last year.

But these reforms have yet to be realized, despite ConnCAN's extensive television and radio ads, rallies, email blasts and letter-writing campaigns, and relentless lobbying at the state Capitol.

Johnston's admirers say he brings passion and persistence to his advocacy for education reform. But other observers say his outspokenness and impatience with procedure have hurt his cause by alienating more than a few key people throughout the education community in Connecticut.

"In several corners they are glad to see him moving on. He has been seen as abrasive. I guess some may call his technique passionate. It depends on where you stand on the issue," said the recently retired longtime spokesman for the State Department of Education Tom Murphy. "Some believe that he has been effective with this approach."

Perhaps the most public expression of irritation at Johnston's style came at a meeting in December of a panel of education leaders considering recommendations for changing the way the state finances public education.

The panel, chaired by then-state Education Commissioner Mark McQuillan, was not planning to take up a proposal backed by Johnston that would have the effect of shifting some state money to charter schools. But Johnston created his own subcommittee with several panel members who would support the idea, and presented a package of reforms to McQuillan before the meeting.

That move infuriated McQuillan, who publicly chastised Johnston for going behind his back.

"You don't run this meeting. I set the agenda," he declared, who was also apparently upset about the governor hosting a meeting to discuss education issues at the same time as his budget meeting.

Citing stress, McQuillan resigned the next day and Johnston was able to get the committee to narrowly approve his initiatives at their next meeting. But the full State Board of Education has yet to take action on the proposal.

Johnston said upsetting the state's top education leader and others "is certainly not something we set out to do," but added, "I'm not going to be able to please everyone. Consensus is not essential -- change is."

A few months later, Johnston went around another influential leader. This time it was the co-chairman of the legislature's Education Committee, Rep. Andy Fleischmann, D-West Hartford, after Fleischmann made it clear that his committee would not be considering ConnCAN's school financing proposal this year.

Johnston managed to get the legislature's Appropriations Committee to consider the bill and host a 6-hour public hearing where parents and students flooded the State Capitol to testify in yellow t-shirts reading "Fund my Child Fairly".

That did not sit well with Fleischmann.

"He does not make himself easy to work with," said Fleischmann. "He has made the mistake of having the belief that to be an advocate you have to fight with people. That's not how the legislative process works."

Like the State Board of Education, the Appropriations Committee never acted on Johnston's proposal.

Gwen Samuel, the leader of the recently created Connecticut Parents Union, said she believes Johnston stirs animosity because of his advocacy for causes that aren't universally popular, not because of his style.

"He is clearly a force to be reckoned with," she said. "He is a thorn for union members and some lawmakers. That's not necessarily a bad thing."

"ConnCAN has been a valuable asset to parents," she added. "The information they give us is invaluable."

An insider now at the Capitol, Samuel said she is well aware that powerful special interest groups and legislators carefully dissect ConnCAN's information. The National Education Association earlier this year helped fund a study through their Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice that discounted ConnCAN's school financing plan.

And legislators are listening too, says Rep. Gary Holder-Winfield, D-New Haven and head of the Black and Puerto Rican Caucus.

"Alex is persistent. He has a presence at the Capitol. Regardless of what people think of him, he has influence. I see Alex as a resource even though I may not always agree with him," he said. "He is always prodding the legislature to move things along. ... It's good to have external forces pushing us to make movements because sometimes people aren't doing what we should be."

Call it coincidence, but an hour after ConnCAN sent out an email blast calling on state legislators to end the practice of school districts laying off teachers based only on their seniority, the state Senate was voting on an amendment raised by the ranking Republican of the Education Committee to do just that. It failed.

Johnston is unfazed by the setbacks, and says ConnCAN has been successful by his standards in mobilizing parents and students to get state leaders to pay attention to their demands.

"This is a political problem. We have to change adult's behavior," he said. "I believe we can."

He also said ConnCAN has been successful in helping tweak education legislation being considered by legislators.

"We have made some incremental progress," he said, but added that he is leaving ConnCAN with the group's top priorities still unaccomplished. "Our work is more important than ever," he said.

Not surprising, the state's teachers unions are not fans of Johnston's initiatives and actively campaign against them. Their hostility towards each other is no secret to those in the education community.

That hostility was outlined in a presentation given at a national American Federation of Teachers conference. The presentation says ConnCAN's "toxic dialogue" was hurting the Connecticut AFT chapter's efforts to defeat a major reform that would have allowed parents to vote to reorganize or close failing schools.

"It's the battle of the Titans. They are really at it at times," said Murphy.

A spokeswoman for the state's largest teachers union -- the Connecticut Education Association -- was not interested in commenting on ConnCAN or Johnston's tenure.

And with 21,000 people receiving their e-mail blasts and 989 Facebook followers, they have proven they are the source many parents turn to for education reform information.

"They have been able to make a name for themselves," said Murphy. "They have been a drastic alternative to what others have been pushing for in the state."

But ConnCAN is now sharing the stage for advocating for these reforms, with two groups with similar goals launching in recent months, one backed by business leaders and another representing parents from urban areas.

"We need all the help we can get," Johnston said.

While Johnston is mum on where his next move will be, he said his replacement will likely play a key role in developing future education policy in the state in the coming months. Malloy has promised to dedicate the upcoming year to improving the state's education system.

Education advocates say this dedication is long overdue, since the state has hosted the largest achievement gap between minority students and their peers for years and a school finance system that is broken.

And even with Johnston's less-than-desired techniques, Fleischmann says the state needs ConnCAN to replace him with someone just as knowledgeable on these subjects.

"He is an extraordinarily intellectual person. He is leaving behind a big void," he said.

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

I am a huge fan of Alex

I am a huge fan of Alex Johnston and am grateful that he has been so (really, politely) outspoken about the problems that exist in Connecticut schools. As far as being "abrasive," I don't know that there is a non-abrasive way to say, "despite our intentions, our schools are failing to teach huge numbers of kids how to read and do math, and oh by the way, the data also tells us our education system discriminates against minority students." ConnCAN has been single-mindedly focused on student outcomes, not on adult egos. Shouldn't this be our focus too?

Diane, Johnston and everyone

Diane, Johnston and everyone else can focus like Zen masters on outcomes but the effort is useless. The outcomes come from standardized tests that simply are not valid indicators of learning when used as they are in isolation.

The unions certainly have their faults but teachers have a crystal clear understanding of the problems with test based evaluation both for evaluating schools and teachers. ConnCann, Adamowski (master of Windham schools or whatever he is now) and the critics of public education make reform more difficult because of this cultish reliance on test scores which takes down the wrong path.

He will be missed, he was a

He will be missed, he was a loud voice for change. The education industry is infected with the "culture of nice". Someone had to say what had to be said.

ConnCann spoke for the enrichment programs, when everyone else was focused on "equity above all else".

He dared compare Ct math scores with Ma and Slovakia! Hint: We are Slovakia!

As far as standardized tests not valid indicators......then what is? We can't go back to each school an island on to itself.

Standardized test scores are

Standardized test scores are not valid as stand alone measures. I raised my SAT verbal score by 70 points by using a practice SAT book one summer. My school received credit for that incrase. I worked at a school that raised SAT scores by steering students to the ACT test. The state superintendent held a press conference at that school to tout the overall increase in state SAT scores. In both cases the increase was not the result of school performance. Similar strategy is used for CAPT and CMT. Adamowski's administration pushed teachers in Hartford to focus during test prep

Read More

Alex has been a bright

Alex has been a bright shining light for education excellence for every child in CT since he started ConnCAN. We don't need more tempered, careful advocates for kids and education.....we need 100 more like Alex....totally prepared, politically astute, focused, outcome oriented, and not afraid to push hard, mix it up and ruffle feathers when that is necessary, and it is very necessary right now. Alex is the model for advocacy!

No system is perfect, to

No system is perfect, to advocate discontinuing testing because it can be "gamed" to a small degree is not honest.

Any gain to "gaming a system" my word not yours, is limited and at what point is does gaming become real student achievement?

We have all been prep'd on how to take a test. Especially multiple choice questions, yet are you advocating eliminating multiple choice question type tests? That is not new, I graduated in the early 1970's from high school and it was old then.

I am assuming by steering you mean the

Read More

Bob, yes, steered lower

Bob, yes, steered lower performing students to the ACT. I don't see how you can say that is dishonest when you seem to casually dismiss some gaming of the system when students are intentionally marginalized.

As far as this being to a "small degree" and "limited" I profoundly disagree. The effort to focus on the "golden band of students" is a central tenement of Adamowski's approach to reform. During the months leading up to CMT or CAPT, Hartford teachers are explicitly tasked with focusing on these students.

As far as the test itself, the issue is not that

Read More

@Sammy, a remarkable

@Sammy, a remarkable misreading of what I wrote.

Disregarding the first paragraph, you further state, "golden band", given that the CMT/CAPTs have been adjusted over the years to measure all students including those in "extra help, free and reduced lunch, ethnic" groups, how would this help?

I am somewhat familiar with the test, and Hartford's scores, I am not surprised that Hartford is not focusing on Strand 25 or problem-solving, and I probably would do the same, given the difficultly Hartford students as a whole are having with more basic strands. Its triage. You need basics before

Read More

This is amazing news; good

This is amazing news; good riddance Alex! Mr. Johnston is the biggest tool in educational reform. He plays on emotions by making great points that people can jump on board with. A great education for all students is a facade he stands behind, but if he were to get his way on most issues, the achievement gap would only get much worse.
He says that ‘money should follow the students’ wherever they choose to go to school. That sounds great in theory, but it would be a logistical nightmare in practice. This would take away tens of thousands of dollars

Read More

"to advocate discontinuing

"to advocate discontinuing testing because it can be "gamed" to a small degree is not honest" - Bob

"I am assuming by steering you mean the less achieving students were directed to ACT, thereby culling the popluation to the "brighest, SAT wise" to the SAT?...Well that is just dishonest." - Bob

I read your comment clearly, Bob. You first support the "gaming" aspect but then call a particular effort to game the system dishonest.

Differentiation means you provide students what they need. Kids scoring the lowest on or kids that are already passing these tests are not receving differentiation

Read More

Any grading system that

Any grading system that relies on numeric data will have flaws and also the ability for manipulation.

But worse is a system that has no reliance on hard data and consequently maintains no standards of quality. ConnCAN was born as a result of a public education system that had no quality control, especially for low income minority students. Over the decades our public education system has become amazingly resistant to the needs of the public and it was - and still is - high time for it to be reformed.

Alex has done an amazing

Read More

Jeff, if you are driving from

Jeff, if you are driving from Hartford and your goal is to reach Boston, making good time while headed to NYC is not progress. Similarly, relying on test scores alone is leading reform in the wrong direction.

Pointing out that something is not working is valid even if an alternative system is not presented. If I am potty training a toddler and he keeps pooping in his pants, I can validly determine the method doesn't work even if I don't have an alternative. Your suggestion is that because we don't have an alternative, we continue the failed program with

Read More

No lost.I hope he now leaves

No lost.I hope he now leaves the New Haven School Board.This is the same guy that talks a good game on education reform,But he is against the will of the people who want a elected school board here in New haven.

Sammy, OK. For the sake of

Sammy, OK. For the sake of argument lets accept your premise that poverty is something to be overcome before we can expect better results in schools. How do you propose to eliminate poverty?

And 3/5 my friend, as much as YOU want it, there is no majority in New Haven who wants an elected school board.

And 3/5 my friend, as much as

And 3/5 my friend, as much as YOU want it, there is no majority in New Haven who wants an elected school board.

Put elected school board as a referendum and see how the majority in New Haven will vote it in.

@sammy no that is not what i

@sammy
no that is not what i wrote and you grow tedious. Here is want you want to hear e. "yes we should go back to the days when every teacher graded the best way they know." hows that?

What a stupid example. To

What a stupid example.

To buy into your example you'd have to believe the tests as currently implemented do not test anything of importance, indeed test singularly un-important items.

And to think I actually thought I could carry on a reasoned discussion with you.

Please stop using Clemens' name. You dishonor him.