State income tax hike hits paychecks starting this week

August 2, 2011

By Keith M. Phaneuf and Jacqueline Rabe

Depending on how much they earn, Connecticut workers could start noticing less in their paychecks at week's end as state government starts collecting at special income tax rates to reflect new increases - and to apply them retroactively back to Jan. 1.

But while Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and his fellow Democrats in the legislature's majority predicted most residents would view those rate increases--which don't impact singles earning less than $50,000 or couples below $100,000--as reasonable to close a massive budget deficit, Republicans said taxpayers would cry loudly and often.

chart

The GOP also said the retroactive provision, which requires the tax department to collect 12 months' worth of income tax increases between now and the calendar year's end, already is being seen as a sign that state government still doesn't have its fiscal house in order.

"For the vast majority of Connecticut citizens it will have little or no impact, and for the people that it will have an impact, a lot of them fall into wage and income bracket that I think they can handle it," Malloy said Monday.

The governor said he doesn't expect a huge outcry, noting that the public had ample warning. When Malloy took office in January, he inherited a built-in deficit for the 2011-12 fiscal year projected as high as $3.67 billion.

"People certainly had notice that it was coming," he said, adding no one should be surprised about the retroactive provision either. "We tax on a calendar year and we budget on a fiscal year. No one really wants to do that but that's how the two calendars interact."

Because low- and low-to-moderate income working families face no rate increase, House Speaker Christopher G. Donovan, D-Meriden, predicted only those households earning more than $1 million might object loudly.

"But they are still making over $1 million," he said, adding that low- and middle-income households still face increases in sales and other taxes, but that was part of a balanced plan to close a large deficit. "People understand that we're asking everybody to sacrifice," he said.

"Nobody likes tax increases but no one - including Republicans - could offer a real alternative," Senate Democratic Caucus spokesman Derek Slap said. "Even Republican-led states like Texas and New Jersey raised taxes to help balance their budgets, (but) they did it by cutting municipal aid and forcing towns to raise property taxes and fees. Connecticut's solution is fairer to middle-income families. Of course Connecticut's budget also includes deep spending cuts and more than $1.5 billion in concessions from state employees - pending ratification. This balanced approach is the best option for our fragile economy."

But Republican lawmakers warned voters don't see a balanced approach to solving the state's fiscal woes.

"Believe me, people know what's in the offing" for their paychecks, Sen. Andrew W. Roraback of Goshen, ranking GOP senator on the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee, said Monday. "I will gladly forward the calls of my constituents to Speaker Donovan."

"The feedback that I'm hearing from my constituents is absolute disgust," said Deputy House Minority Leader Vincent J. Candelora, R-North Branford, who also serves on the tax-writing Finance committee. "People's perception (about the retroactivity) is that we are going back in time to pluck out more revenue because the legislature and the governor failed to do their job."

About two-thirds of the nearly $3.7 billion projected deficit was closed through tax and fee hikes and from other revenue growth. And though the remaining third was closed by spending less than the level needed to maintain current services, the bulk of that savings - about $700 million this fiscal year - would come from a concession deal yet to be ratified by state employee unions.

"We still need to reduce government to reflect" the struggling economy, Candelora added.

The president of a coalition of 30 community-based taxpayer groups warned that low- and middle-income households already are frustrated by the $1.5 billion tax and fee hike built into the new budget, even if their income tax rates don't change. Susan Kniep is a former East Hartford mayor and current president of the Connecticut Federation of Taxpayer Organizations.

"The taxpayers in Connecticut are far more savvy than they have ever been," Kniep said. "There's a big, big concern here in the state of Connecticut because we increased taxes by $1.5 billion and the taxpayers take it all into account."

Though income tax hikes accounted for nearly $900 million of that total, consumers are aware that the overall sales tax rate rose from 6 to 6.35 percent last month, and that numerous exemptions on goods and services were removed, Kniep said.

The legislature and governor also raised taxes on cigarettes, alcohol, diesel fuel, and electricity generation.

And though the income tax rate hikes are aimed at singles earning more than $50,000 and couples earning more than $100,000, the legislature also reduced a popular property tax credit - which many middle-income households enjoy - from $500 to $300. Taxpayers care about a $200 income tax increase, she said, regardless of whether it is taken gradually through paycheck withholding, or all at once when they file their income tax returns next spring.

"We know we are going to feel the pain," she said.

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

Angry Ct taxpayers are a

Angry Ct taxpayers are a sleeping giant. Malloy and the Democrats have a big surprise coming to them at the next election.

Why does no one think

Why does no one think historically? Gov. Rell did nothing to fix any of this- nor Rowland
This mess was a long time in the making and there is no choice now but to fix and yes it is painful to do so

But while Gov. Dannel P.

But while Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and his fellow Democrats in the legislature's majority predicted most residents would view those rate increases--which don't impact singles earning less than $50,000 or couples below $100,000--as reasonable to close a massive budget deficit

This statement "which don't impact singles earning less than $50,000 or couples below $100,000" i would like to know why my paycheck got hit with such a big loss since i make way less than $100k and married with children and have a mortgage? and so have my fellow coworkers

is anyone thinking in Hartford, we are in a recession,

Read More

I was shocked to learn that

I was shocked to learn that CT Withholding Tax Formula is designed to cause over withholding from my salary to collect the retroactive income tax increase.
I had over withholding of $1,400 from my most recent check when the correct amount should have been $400.
I'm not a big earner and I need that extra $1,000 for my family's living and educational expenses.
The DRS should be investigated because the rulings they published are faulty and punishing.
I'm willing to review the official documentation with you so you can learn of the problem first hand.
You will see how this

Read More

These idiot dems in the

These idiot dems in the legislature and the governor don't get it. Since when does a single person making $250K qualify as a millionaire. In Fairfield County someone making $250K is middle class, yet those of us in that category are being taxed like millionaires. No wonder individuals and small businesses are or will be fleeing the state. The legislature is doing to this state what Obama is doing to this country. A sad time for all of us, of course unless your a union employee.

Enough is Enough There are

Enough is Enough

There are other ways to make it happen that are less painful, reduce government to start, Rell did what she could with a failing US economy (Obama) Malloy is just passing the sacrifice to the people who are already paying too much to pay for those in the state who don't pay taxes, Most are working two jobs just to stay afloat with all these new taxes Malloy has implemented, enough is enough! We have no more to give.

(When the government is big enough to give you what you need, it is then big enough to

Read More

Gov. Malloy was credited with

Gov. Malloy was credited with more intelligence in the last election than he deserved. The man has no idea how to manage his government's affairs and he has left every CT citizen I talk to wishing they had not voted for him. I am jealous of NY and NJ residents who have Governors with more vision and capability to know how they can achieve the savings required to balance the books for their states. We have an incompetent halfwit who resorts to the easy option to recoup deficit, anyone with half a brain could have taken this

Read More

It is 11/24 and they have not

It is 11/24 and they have not corrected the snafu... unfortunately, I am sure it has cost a lot of manhours in human resources which are not reimbursable. I wonder how it is that they cannot get this straight!

We had to make numerous calls last month to fix a 4K error, and now some retroactive pay was taken 100%!

For crying out loud.

Interestingly, I had emailed last month asking what the max was and I got a link to the website as a reply two months later. Frustrating! It is one thing to be double

Read More

I'm experiencing a great

I'm experiencing a great decrease in pay also. I worked o.t and when I viewed my check I was in tears. How can 1000 be taken out my check and I'm left with only 550...How can I pay my bills? How can I survive? I feel like I'm paying for the states mismanagement...I'm furious...

I am 50 years old, working in

I am 50 years old, working in CT all of my life, and for the first time in my life my employer threw up their hands and said "figure it out yourself" and gave me the 15-page instruction form on how to tell THEM how much tax to withdraw. My company is a large national corporation. I had EXTRA tax withdrawn for the past 15 YEARS to cover a personal business, but with the retroactive nonsense DRS could not differentiate between extra payments during the first half of the year and required payments for the whole year.

Read More

All I have to say is how

All I have to say is how arrogant narrow minded and inconsidered Gov.Malloy and company really are. Im one of them single working class individual that earned 54k this year, Im very apalled by the arrogance of this governor when he states and I quote "For the vast majority of Connecticut citizens it will have little or no impact, and for the people that it will have an impact, a lot of them fall into wage and income bracket that I think they can handle it," I ask you Gov. Malloy how do you know this act taken by

Read More

All I have to say is how

All I have to say is how arrogant narrow minded and inconsidered Gov.Malloy and company really are. Im one of them single working class individual that earned 54k this year, Im very apalled by the arrogance of this governor when he states and I quote "For the vast majority of Connecticut citizens it will have little or no impact, and for the people that it will have an impact, a lot of them fall into wage and income bracket that I think they can handle it," I ask you Gov. Malloy how do you know this act taken by

Read More