Initial review finds 15 employees suspected of Irene fraud

December 7, 2011

By Mark Pazniokas

The administration of Gov. Dannel P. Malloy gave state agency heads Wednesday the names of 15 state employees suspected of obtaining Irene disaster aid through "outright fraud," including lying about assets and claiming a dead relative as a household member.

"Based on my administration's investigation, it appears clear that the abuses of public trust involved go beyond simply lying about income," Malloy said in an emailed statement at midafternoon. "In some instances, people lied about assets under their control or even listed a deceased relative as living in the household. Given the information known to us, these were not oversights or honest mistakes.

"This was outright fraud, and it will not stand."

The inquiry is continuing, but state agency heads were given the first batch of names of employees who appear to have lied on applications for aid that was dependent on an applicant's income, household size and uninsured storm losses. The agency heads were notified, because the state intends to begin disciplinary actions as soon as fraud is confirmed, without waiting for a criminal investigation.

Malloy faces press

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy facing the press.

"If that proves to be the case, we will take steps earnestly, quickly, swiftly and severely," Malloy said told reporters at the state Capitol on Wednesday morning after returning on a red-eye flight from a Democratic governors' meeting in California.

Andrew McDonald, the governor's general counsel, said in the morning that the state had identified no more than 24 employees who appear to have underreported income to qualify for aid, but he cautioned that the number could rise as the inquiry continues. About 800 state employees obtained the federally funded Irene assistance.

A statement setting the initial number at 15 was issued at 3:42 p.m. The administration declined to identify the employees by name, title or agency.

Malloy also responded earlier Wednesday to a WTNH-TV report featuring an anonymous source who claimed that the Department of Social Services, which administered the disaster program, is ill-equipped to stop and detect fraud.

"I can assure you that my administration will take those kinds of reports very seriously," Malloy said, noting that a whistleblower law protects any employees in a position to make similar reports. "Anybody who has any information, please bring it to me."

Malloy was asked if the reports of fraud were embarrassing.

"Sure, for Connecticut, I think it's embarrassing," he replied.

Malloy defended his commissioner of social services, Roderick Bremby, whom he recruited to overhaul a department laboring with an antiquated computer system, for discovering and disclosing irregularities in the aid program.

"First of all, I am proud of the commissioner and how he is conducting himself," said Malloy, when asked if the commissioner could face repercussions. "Let's just stop right there."

A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which funded the program, defended DSS Monday in an interview with The Mirror. The discovery of the apparent fraud was evidence of adequate safeguards, not lax oversight, said Aaron Lavallee, a USDA spokesman.

Malloy

D-SNAP, the Disaster Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funded by federal dollars and run by the state, was designed to minimize red tape, while requiring sufficient oversight to catch fraud, Lavallee said.

"This nutrition assistance program is designed as a rapid response to families in need, and it includes important system controls to safeguard taxpayer dollars," Lavallee said. "The safeguards in place worked, and we will continue to support the state to make sure the program is targeted towards those families who need it the most."

The suspected fraud was discovered by state Department of Social Service employees conducting a federally required review, including a random check of one-half of 1 percent of all recipients, plus a check of every aid recipient employed by the administering agency -- DSS in the case of Connecticut.

State auditors said Monday that of the approximately 800 state employees to obtain aid, 41 were employed at the DSS. In all, 23,726 households with 74,230 people got the aid.

Eligible households were to receive food aid ranging from $200 for a single adult to $1,202 for a family of eight. Applicants had to identify uninsured disaster losses incurred from Aug. 27 to Sept. 25. Qualified losses included lost wages and expenses for temporary shelter, emergency repairs and health care due to the tropical storm that destroyed or significantly damaged hundreds of homes.

The maximum monthly "take-home income and liquid assets" an applicant could have for the covered 30-day period was $2,186 for a single adult, $2,847 for a household of two, $3,272 for three, $3,859 for four, $4,245 for five, $4,753 for six, $5,116 for seven and $5,479 for eight.

The program already was the subject of a review by the state auditors at the request of Sen. Joseph Markley, R-Southington, in response to news coverage of long lines and some chaotic scenes of applicants for D-SNAP outside DSS offices.

During the five-day application period, enough people showed up at many of DSS' regional offices that lines stretched out the door and down the block. Some applicants were served at a community center in Hamden when the nearby New Haven DSS office became overcrowded.

Malloy was unsure today if the state would give a closer look to non-state employees who obtained the aid.

"Let me be very clear. Right now, I know what I am concentrating on," Malloy said. "We're concentrating on state employees, because it's not only having broken the law, but it's this violation of the trust."

 

 

 

 

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

What a joke! The headlines

What a joke!

The headlines (here and elsewhere) have led the public to believe there's rampant fraud being perpetrated by state employees.

Now we learn that MAYBE 24 employees have fraudulently participated in the program. Considering there are over 40,000 state employees, that works out to less than .001% of the state workforce.

I think an apology is due to the 99.99% of state employees that have unfairly marred and slandered by this non-story!

If the governor doesn't

If the governor doesn't investigate all 23,000 people he will lose whatever credability he has left!

If the Malloy administration

If the Malloy administration doesn't bother to check the validity of each and every D-SNAP application and award he'll have some REALLY serious fallout to deal with. This is a FEDERAL program, not merely some strictly local thing administered with State taxes.

If it's only 24 of the 800

If it's only 24 of the 800 then it was handled like a pro. Set the expectations for abuse real high and then produce a handful of employees adn some with weepy hard luck stories.

I certainly hope the state

I certainly hope the state will go after non-employees who committed fraud! If the ratio to beneficiaries to fraudsters stays constant, then 800/24 = 23,762/712.86 which means that there are likely 713 other applicants that committed fraud. Why stop prosecutions at 24 when you have a good reason to suspect there are over 700 more?

I think an apology is the

I think an apology is the least this guy can do, after maligning state employees and demonizing them in the press, all for his own political gain.

So now it's down to *15*... ?

So now it's down to *15*... ?

I am certainly not a plant on

I am certainly not a plant on this site, and I am certainly the minority. My conclusions, after the examining the record and reading everything I can on the matter, is that Malloy is doing the best job that can be done.

You reactionary Tea Pots hate him? No kidding, but what would you have done with that office that would have passed the Dem controlled Bolshevik legislature?

You union robots hate him? Good luck to you under the next Tea Party guv.

You entitlement dems hate him? See you in the history book.

And you state employees...

Read More

I'm surprised that DSS has

I'm surprised that DSS has the time and resourses to conduct this investigation quickly when it can not investigate its own clients suspected of welfare fraud that go unprocessd. It seems that this is somehow more inportant for a one time payment program, then DSS own clients who continue to receive benefits monthly.

Malloy really hates his state

Malloy really hates his state employees. Always something yeah only state workers have fraud this relief give me a break. Its not all, less then what 3% when all said and done. Well I hope all that received relief gets investigated. By the way thanks for our x-mas bonus yeah isn't that a joke back tax BS.

I know this for sure...Malloy

I know this for sure...Malloy won't have my vote! We are being robbed by the state on tax increases and now this? Who is paying for the investigation? I'm so sick of this...