There's agreement that too few children in Connecticut have access to quality early education programs, but the Malloy administration and advocates are butting heads on how to get to a near-universal system.
Gov. Dannel P. Malloy says the power to expand early education should remain with lawmakers, while advocates say they worry that lawmakers will continue to look at early education programs as ATMs when budgets are tight.
"This is a civil right and a human right," said Sen. Beth Bye, D-West Hartford, who has a long career in early education. "We know right now there is not access in an equitable way."
Advocates were counting on the Superior Court in Hartford to step in and require that early education be considered a constitutional obligation, but Malloy says that nowhere in the state Constitution will you find a requirement that early education be provided. He is backing a motion filed by the state's attorney general office to exclude early education from a much broader lawsuit that charges the state has failed to adequately fund education as a whole.
"The Constitution is the Constitution ... This is a legal matter," Malloy, a lawyer himself, said, standing outside the state Senate chamber Wednesday. "The framers of the Constitution, including at its last major revision, did not anticipate early childhood education as being part of the guarantee. ... You don't have a bigger supporter of early childhood education here."
To highlight the administration's intentions for the future of early education, Education Commissioner Stefan Pryor went straight to the source last week: Stamford, where Malloy, the city's former mayor, drastically expanded preschool.
"He rants about this," Pryor said while touring one of several publicly funded preschools that Malloy helped open, the William Pitt Children's Learning Center. "This is great. Early intervention makes all the sense in the world."
Malloy said during both the campaign and Wednesday that the state cannot afford a universal approach. Rather, he said, he wants to launch a system where children from low-income families are provided free or affordable preschool, as he did for hundreds in Stamford.
Bridget Fox, who led the initiatives under Malloy in Stamford and is still in charge of the programs, says 15 percent of students in Stamford are showing up for school without a preschool experience. But for low-income children, it's no longer because their parents can't afford preschool.
Statewide, almost 20 percent of children have not attended preschool, reports the State Department of Education. And in urban districts, those rates are much higher, reports the Early Childhood Alliance and Connecticut Voices for Children. In Bridgeport, 35 percent of students show up for kindergarten with no early education, 32 percent in Hartford and 40 percent in Waterbury.
But, advocates said, it's not Malloy they are worried about. After all, he has promised to fund 1,000 new early education seats, and he has laid out a 289-page plan for early education in his federal Race to the Top application.
They worry about what future administrators and lawmakers will do to early education if it is not an entitlement.
"It shocked me," Rep. Gary Holder-Winfield, D-New Haven, leader of the state's Black and Puerto Rican Caucus, said of his surprise that Malloy was backing what could lead to a long-term decline in available early education. "It's not that I didn't believe people are serious in their intentions, but elections change things."
As mayor of Stamford, Malloy was part of the coalition asking the courts to intervene in how schools -- including preschool -- are funded.
Malloy said he can't ignore the Constitution. He said he will move forward "as rapidly as financial circumstances will allow us to getting to universal pre-K, not as a universally provided service to all of our citizens, but that we design a program where we step in and make sure no person is denied a pre-K because of their financial circumstances."
But with high percentages of students still showing up for kindergarten unprepared, advocates are growing impatient and want the court to step in.
"This isn't fair to these kids," said Diane Kaplan DeVries, who is in charge of the coalition with the lawsuit against the state. "Early education needs to be an entitlement."
Not having formal pre-school experience does NOT equate with being 'unprepared' for kindergarten. Many parents do a wonderful job getting their children ready for further education without ever sending them to a single day of pre-school, and they reap the benefit of being able to enjoy their own children without the introduction of ideas or beliefs with which they may disagree. The educrats have spent decades trying to convince parents that children can only be educated in school - don't fall for it!
This is one of the more incredible developments of the year. As the back drop, the Connecticut Supreme Court rules that students in Connecticut have a constitutional right to an education that prepares them to succeed in life. A new Democratic governor and a new Democrat attorney general are elected who both claim to support early childhood education and there is widespread recognition, across the political spectrum, that access to early education program is one of, if not the most important factors when it comes to preparing students to succeed in school.
Then, in the very year these
Read MoreThere is no question that pre-k, early childhood education is a core strategy of any great system of public education.
But there is also no question that if the CCJEF lawsuit succeeds without any substantial changes in the way we deliver education, our state will waste enormous resources - which will serve only to prop up the status quo system.
Criticsm of Jepson for trying to exclude Pre-K from the scope of the suit is a big, fat, red herring.
After a few seconds on Google, I found some information about long-term studies of the effects of pre-school. Here is one quote worth some thought: "When the researchers checked in again eight years later, things had gotten even worse for the young adults who had attended a preschool with a heavy dose of skills instruction and positive reinforcement. They didn’t differ from their peers in the other programs with respect to their literacy skills, total amount of schooling, income, or employment status. But they were far more likely to have been arrested for a felony at some point
Read MoreMathlady, the research you cite compared specific preschool programs. There is no basis for generalizing it to preschool in general. In fact, your study is a comparison of DIFFERENT types of preschool, e.g. direct instruction versus free-play. Also, the use of "educrats" as a pejorative term indicates bias in your perspective. This is clearly a story about kids in low SES families not experiencing the advantages of preschool. Do you really think those kids in the 40% from Waterbury are receiving the "wonderful" home preparation you describe?
This issue reflects a Jeffersonian perspective that a democratic society is founded on
Read MoreI can say this. There are always half witted nitwits that propound untested
and totally unproven theories to create their own pet projects. Pre-K education propounded by such nitwits is such one.
The real education and the behavioral patterns of a child start and are determined when it is still growing in the womb of its mother, i.e. during the 9-10 months of pregnancy. That is when the both parents should conduct themselves in a moral and proper dignified way. The mental processes of a woman are conveyed to her child at this very early stage, and they last till
Read Morerealkook, How do we first reform society? Practical solutions please.
Conducting ourselves in a moral and proper manner is the means to reforming education?!?!
Dang, I was thinking intensive reading, health services, family support services, developing inquiry, training students to be independent thinkers etc. I had it all wrong. If we simply behave ourselves society will fullfill Jefferson's vision of an educated populace...lucky for Fox News that's not going to happen.
Jeff Klaus: The cardinal principles and the basic ground rules are given. If you are an educator, then you should (or ought to) know and/or you should be able to figure out that any event or any act or any transaction that is compatible in accordance with the said cardinal principles will lead to real education, plus bring in conflicts-free environment and societal harmony. Moral suasion is more powerful than legal splitting of hairs and demanding undeserved rights. Wish you best of luck in right thinking that should lead to real answers to our societal/national problems.