Your credit card bill is high? The state owes $19.5 billion

December 22, 2011

By Keith M. Phaneuf

Holiday shoppers aren't the only ones taking a wary look at their credit card balances these days.

State government recently undertook its own annual debt review, looking from several perspectives but coming to the same conclusion each time: Connecticut remains one of the most indebted states in the nation.

The state entered the fiscal year with close to $19.5 billion in debt owed to investors who purchased state bonds to finance municipal school construction, capital programs at public colleges and universities, road and bridge upgrades, repairs to state buildings and other projects. That's according to fiscal projection reports filed recently with the legislature both by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's budget staff and by the legislature's nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Analysis.

Another way to look at that debt, according to Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's budget staff, is that it represents more than $5,569 for every man, woman and child in Connecticut, based on U.S. Census population numbers. That is the highest debt level of any state in the nation.

But some officials note that not all of Connecticut's bonding is paid off over the long-term, 10 or 20 years, using tax dollars. Some financed projects are paid off using the revenue they raise, such as a parking receipts used to cover the debt on a new public garage.

What if those types of projects are taken out of the equation? Connecticut's per person debt shrinks to $5,236 per person, but that still ranks first.

Then again, can't Connecticut afford a larger limit on its credit card, given that it's one of the wealthiest states?

According to nonpartisan legislative analysts, if tax-supported debt is viewed as a percentage of personal income here, then Connecticut ranks as only the third-most-indebted state, slipping behind Hawaii and Massachusetts.

What about county government? Connecticut doesn't have it. How does the Nutmeg State rank in a comparison of debt incurred at the municipal, regional and state level combined? Connecticut's ranking slides a little, but it still has the fifth-highest debt per person.

"We've been high for years," Sen. Eileen Daily, D-Westbrook, co-chairwoman of the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee said Thursday. "Whether that is good, bad or indifferent, that was part of the way we do business."

In fact, the share of annual state spending devoted to paying off bonded debt rose sharply after the income tax was enacted in 1991.

In each of the five years prior to that tax, debt service ranged between 6.2 and 7.7 percent of the annual budget, according to budget records. It jumped to nearly 9 percent in the first year after the tax, hit double-digits by 1996 and has remained there ever since. About 10.4 percent of this year's total budget, or $2.2 billion, will cover payments on bonded debt.

"The problem isn't how we compare with other states," said Sen. Joseph Markley, R-Southington, a member of the Appropriations Committee and one of the most vocal critics of Connecticut's debt. "Every other state is in trouble too. The problem is simple: We have too much debt."

And the problem with this bonded debt, Markley said, is mild when compared with Connecticut's so-called "soft debt," its obligations to fund current and future pension and health care benefits to retired state employees and municipal teachers.

Add those costs to the bonding obligations and the state's total long-term debt approaches $72 billion, or $20,450 for every person.

The ranking GOP senator on the Finance panel's Bonding Subcommittee, Tony Guglielmo of Stafford, said he fears officials silently have accepted that a debt crisis in the not-too-distant future is unavoidable.

"It really makes me wonder," he said. "I think people think it's too big to change it. They just shrug."

But Daily said that since Malloy took office in January, Connecticut already has taken one major step forward: no longer using its credit card to pay for annual operating costs.

Legislators and former Gov. M. Jodi Rell borrowed more than $1 billion in June 2009 to mitigate the need for tax hikes or spending cuts. They also endorsed nearly $1 billion more in May 2010. That borrowing, which would have been repaid with a surcharge on residential and business utility bills, was canceled last summer by Malloy and the legislature as tax revenues began to rebound from the last recession.

"We should all be vigilante now in terms of our borrowing, but at least we are using it now to invest in projects that create jobs," Daily said.

And the Malloy administration indicated last month it isn't ready to throw in the towel.

Office of Policy and Management Secretary Benjamin Barnes challenged the Appropriations and Finance committees to work with the administration next to shore up the state workers' pension fund. One of the single-largest areas of debt in state government, that fund needs another $11.7 billion to cover all of its obligations.

And while must be resolved over the long-term, Barnes told lawmakers there's only one way to close most of that gap: start contributing more each year.

"The only way to solve long-term structural liabilities is to pay them off," he said last month, adding that the sooner Connecticut addresses this problem, the more progress it will make. That's because larger contributions to the pension fund will increase investment earnings, which in turn will be reinvested and produce more income for the pension system in future years.

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

Yeah Tony, we don't want to

Yeah Tony, we don't want to go into debt over clean water projects in your hometown, do we??

March 11, 2009
State Senator Tony Guglielmo, R-Stafford, today is praising a decision to expand the state’s list of “shovel ready” clean water projects to include the Stafford Wastewater Treatment facility. This means that funding in the amount $12.5 million can be made available this year to help with the costs associated with the project. Earlier today, Gov. M. Jodi Rell announced that Stafford along with the towns of New Milford and South Windsor would be added to the list of

Read More

a lotof school construction

a lotof school construction like oxford and prospect/beacon fslls was simply a result of parents wanting to give their kids more opportunity tp play sports. More schools mean more positions. Aldrrmen and BOE members called it free mone. Teachers in retirrment will be in a position to spend their money if they stsy in Ct. They believe thst teacher pension debt is stimulative, so do state workers who believe taxpayers complsin too much.

by the way, Barnes said this

by the way, Barnes said this "That's because larger contributions to the pension fund will increase investment earnings, which in turn will be reinvested and produce more income for the pension system in future years". Since the DJIA peaked in Oct 07 at 14300 investments have lost money since then. It is flat or below since 2000 so no money there. Fixed income is less than 4% so they need 8% to break even on their debt obligations. His statement is demonstrably false. Why should we be responsible for ONeill, Weicker, Sullivan, Cibes

Read More

to be fair, i used the

to be fair, i used the timeframe of 2000 to 2012 for the flat DJIA, or the timeframe of 2007 to 2012 for the 20% decline, or the present 10 year US t-bill note of 2% I am refering to the long term stewardship of pensions funds which is the pension manager's responsibility. Since the S and P bottomed at 666(easy to remember) and has gone as high as 1300 there is money to be made as was cited by the editor in the past year. If you picked the bottom at 666 and did not ride it to

Read More

Editor: While you correctly

Editor:
While you correctly cite the performance for one year, a more valid measure is the longer term. As of September 30,the seven year (the longest period reported)return for the funds has averaged 4.47% ( this is availble on the Treasurer's Web Site @ http://www.state.ct.us/ott/pensiondocs/fundperf/fundperformance.pdf). The actuaries have assumed an annual return of 8.25%.
The fact is that if contributons are based on an assumed rate of return 3+% higher than actual, it is impossible to make up the difference.
At a minimum, Barnes statement signicantly understates the problem. (As do the actuarial calculations of the unfunded liabilities

Read More

Dear Editor regarding your

Dear Editor regarding your note:

Yes the year and June 30th 2011 return for CT Retirement Plans and Trust funds was 20.75 and the Dow stood at 12314. On Sept 30th three months later it stood at 10913 and the fund dropped from 25.2b to 22.4billion¹ a drop of 2.8b and 11% in just three months. The point is that you should not cherry pick a period for exceptional results. As of September 30th 2011 the comined annual five years return on these funds was only 1.71% yet we (our government officials) allow the pension plans to

Read More

The editor's note was simply

The editor's note was simply to take issue with the broad claim that Barnes had made a "demonstrably false" statement when he suggested that the state's investing in the markets would help defray pension costs. As the comments on this thread show, it is a point that can be argued. It is not demonstrably false.
Mark Pazniokas
Capitol Bureau Chief

Unfortunately CT really has

Unfortunately CT really has not taken a step forward regarding no longer using its credit card for annual operating costs. In this past Session, in the Jackson Labs Deal, this is exactly what the state did! The citizens of our state will be paying principal and interest costs for years to come because we used our state credit card to pay for nearly $100 million dollars of annual operating costs for a private conmpany! And for a non-profit private company that will pay no income taxes and no property taxes. Using the states credit card for

Read More

Mark, Correct. More money

Mark,
Correct. More money invested should increase investment income. So what? Set up a retirement plan at age 62, max out the contributions, and hope for 100%+ annual returns. There's a plan!!
What the thread comments do demonstrate is the wholesale under reporting that exists on this subject. The Ct Media simply spits back whatever the State tells them when the facts beg for deeper analysis.
Your comment on the one year performance is totally out of context with long term performance, and the scope of the problem.
If you know where there's a guaranteed 8.25% return, report it. It

Read More

I have followed this siuation

I have followed this siuation for many,many years and the situation is getting worse by the year not better. Why isn't anyone, including Barnes ,talking about the retiree health care obligations. Of everything that is going on this is by far the worst problem. We have an obligation of approximately $30 billion to state workers and a fund of only $10 million,yes $10 million not billions. There are no funds to invest to make up this shortfall.
As we all know health care costs are increasing more than inflation/cost of living or any other measure you want to use

Read More

The trade and commerce of the

The trade and commerce of the whole world have been no longer (i.e. for more than one hundred years now) on a "cash and carry" basis. That is how supply and demand economics are being manipulated and managed. Cash basis of accounting has been out of sync with the concept of "true income", and the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), for commercial enterprises, have gradually evolved out of this new reality.

Even the state governments had to bow before this transformation, and the governmental GAAP has been adjusted to account for their revenues and expenditures under the "accrual basis"

Read More

Anybody who thinks the state

Anybody who thinks the state will grow it's way to financial solvency with investments is dreaming. We spent our way into poverty mostly with over-generous commitments to state workers and teachers. Now the only way back is to re-mediate those commitments.

Governor Malloy's recent SEBAC deal was horrible. Within a few years our indebtedness from pension and health care will be worse than ever. Meanwhile the new financial bubble from artificially pumped-up stock prices and the ongoing mortgage debacle will drive property values and investment returns lower, not higher.

Leave it to a liberal (Daily)

Leave it to a liberal (Daily) to respond that accepting indebtedness has been something CT has always done and will continue to do.....is her head in the sand?

Connecticut shoppers are just

Connecticut shoppers are just anybody out there who are wisely using their credit cards in times of crisis. Who would have not be on midnight sale? It's a silly thing but its a smart choice.You can save their at almost 50%-75% on selected items and that's not bad. credit cards are almost our money partners.And if times comes that credit card bills would be high. Oh my.This is such a terrible night mare of debts waiting as ahead.I know that taking charge cards is almost completely necessary for a business owner. Signing on to that agreement, however, may mean signing

Read More