Lawmakers pledge to preserve school funding

June 10, 2010

By Robert A. Frahm

Despite a warning this week that the loss of federal stimulus money could blow a gaping hole in school budgets across Connecticut, leading lawmakers say the legislature is prepared to fill that gap.

The state has relied on federal stimulus money to prop up state school aid to municipalities, but projections by the legislature's Office of Fiscal Analysis indicate that legislators intend to keep that aid at existing levels even after stimulus funds dry up.

"It was never our intention to reduce funding to towns because federal money runs out," said state Sen. Toni Harp, D-New Haven, co-chairman of the legislature's Appropriations Committee. "Our commitment to that is clear."

harp, toni

Sen. Toni Harp: 'Our commitment is clear'

Earlier this week, state Education Commissioner Mark McQuillan made a plea for a renewal of federal stimulus funds to avert the loss of thousands of teaching jobs.

Connecticut has received about $785 million so far in federal stimulus money for schools, but that money is scheduled to dry up in 2011, potentially resulting in massive layoffs for the 2011-12 school year, McQuillan warned.

"Without action by Congress to continue its support of our schools, we face dire consequences at the local level," McQuillan said in a letter to members of the state's Congressional delegation.

The state's Education Cost Sharing grant - by far the largest grant to municipalities - is just under $1.9 billion, but the state has been able to hold that figure steady because of an infusion of federal stimulus funds. The stimulus accounts for about 14 percent of the grant, or roughly $270 million.

If that dries up, making it up will be difficult, especially against the backdrop of the state's ongoing fiscal crisis.

"It's a pretty big hole to fill," Harp said. Nevertheless, she said, "We're not going to back away from that commitment."

State Sen. Thomas Gaffey, the co-chairman of the legislature's Education Committee, agreed. "It's critical," said Gaffey, D-Meriden. "To not do that would be disastrous for every municipality in Connecticut. . . . We all know we'll be grappling with a huge budget challenge again, but we cannot responsibly respond to that by just laying it off on cities and towns."

However, even if the legislature keeps school aid at current levels, educators expect to see continuing strains on local budgets, including further layoffs, as costs continue to rise.

In his letter to Connecticut's Congressional delegation, McQuillan urged support for pending legislation that would provide additional stimulus funding aimed specifically at preserving teachers' jobs.

That money would be welcome, said state Rep. Andrew Fleischmann, D-West Hartford, co-chairman of the legislature's Education Committee.

"I agree with the commissioner that the federal delegation should be seeking these stimulus dollars," Fleischmann said. "My personal goal would be first get the federal stimulus dollars, and, if we don't, that the state step up to the plate."

 

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

Where parents & students have no interest in education

Most parents of students have no moral and ethical commitment to the education and true welfare of their children. Some students even do not know who their fathers are. This sex maniac society is making children the wards of the society. The whole thing is a commercial enterprise, and the only beneficiaries are food vendors, transportation services, maintenance workers, administrators, and faculty for doing a shoddy job, if at all. Stop funding to schools by state totally and let parents spend money from their own pockets. Then, and then only they will realize how important education is. Anything given free

Read More

Schools

In the big picture competition and school choice is the only way that Connecticut brings its education programs into the 21st century.
The State and local government need to provide and pay for competitive alternatives to public schools. This will force public schools to either improve the services they offer or face going out of business.
If this State (and nation for that matter) does not innovate how it provides and pays for public services the quality of life and prosperity will suffer for this and coming generations.

The operative sentence here

The operative sentence here is "either improve the services or face going out of business". When taxpayers are robbed blindly in the name of education and other services like maintenance of roads, police services, are they getting their money's worth? It is easy for legislators to call for all kinds of goodies, but are they willing to put their own estates on line? True "user fees" should be paid by all irrespective of their financial condition. Otherwise, it will have no value.

People wake up.This school

People wake up.This school reform is noting more than lining the pockets of the corporate vampires and bust teachers unions.

http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/obama-and-charter-school-sug...